PD29 Protocol For Rapid Reviews And Clinical Recommendations Using Artificial Intelligence Tools And Agile Processes

Introduction Rapid reviews are a subset of systematic reviews developed in the past decade to maintain methodological rigor while accelerating the review process. Increasingly, artificial intelligence tools are being utilized to enhance various aspects of these reviews, ensuring greater efficiency. Typically, rapid reviews support official recommendations by medical societies or healthcare institutions. Methods Based on the Guidelines International Network-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and publications from prominent institutions in systematic reviews, particularly the Cochrane Collaboration, the World Health Organization, McMaster University, and the Joanna Briggs Institute, an institutional protocol for rapid reviews was developed to support the creation of institutional clinical recommendations. This protocol was subjected to internal discussions within the Health Technology Assessment Unit of the National Institute of Cardiology, external evaluation by the Guidelines Committee of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology, and was refined throughout the development of guidelines for these institutions. Agile processes and artificial intelligence tools were tested to enhance efficiency. Results The development of one position statement, four clinical recommendations, and an institutional protocol facilitated refinement of the entire process. Weekly sprint methodology was incorporated, five artificial intelligence tools were integrated to support systematic review methods, an online storage standard was established, and a task checklist was created. These modifications enabled the completion of a rapid review in approximately three months. Conclusions The globalization of health care and rapid system changes require medical institutions to quickly develop evidence-based recommendations. Rapid reviews accelerate access to quality knowledge. This paper highlighted tools tested and incorporated to streamline the process, ensuring efficiency while maintaining the quality and scientific rigor of the final document.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101645
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD29 Protocol For Rapid Reviews And Clinical Recommendations Using Artificial Intelligence Tools And Agile Processes

Leonardo Luna
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

PD29 Protocol For Rapid Reviews And Clinical Recommendations Using Artificial Intelligence Tools And Agile Processes

Leonardo Luna
article en

Abstract

Introduction Rapid reviews are a subset of systematic reviews developed in the past decade to maintain methodological rigor while accelerating the review process. Increasingly, artificial intelligence tools are being utilized to enhance various aspects of these reviews, ensuring greater efficiency. Typically, rapid reviews support official recommendations by medical societies or healthcare institutions. Methods Based on the Guidelines International Network-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and publications from prominent institutions in systematic reviews, particularly the Cochrane Collaboration, the World Health Organization, McMaster University, and the Joanna Briggs Institute, an institutional protocol for rapid reviews was developed to support the creation of institutional clinical recommendations. This protocol was subjected to internal discussions within the Health Technology Assessment Unit of the National Institute of Cardiology, external evaluation by the Guidelines Committee of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology, and was refined throughout the development of guidelines for these institutions. Agile processes and artificial intelligence tools were tested to enhance efficiency. Results The development of one position statement, four clinical recommendations, and an institutional protocol facilitated refinement of the entire process. Weekly sprint methodology was incorporated, five artificial intelligence tools were integrated to support systematic review methods, an online storage standard was established, and a task checklist was created. These modifications enabled the completion of a rapid review in approximately three months. Conclusions The globalization of health care and rapid system changes require medical institutions to quickly develop evidence-based recommendations. Rapid reviews accelerate access to quality knowledge. This paper highlighted tools tested and incorporated to streamline the process, ensuring efficiency while maintaining the quality and scientific rigor of the final document.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.