229 Robotic Cholecystectomy: Utility in Morbidly Obese Patients

Abstract Aim Minimal data suggest the superiority of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) for outcomes, however robotic surgery may benefit specific patient cohorts, such as the morbidly obese (BMI 40 m/kg2). We present outcomes in RC from a single institution with a significant proportion of patients with class III & IV obesity. Method A retrospective analysis of RCs performed over 30 months was conducted, assessing cases for indicative pathology, complications, length of stay, BMI and comorbidity. Comparison was made between patients with BMI <40 m/kg2 and BMI >40 m/kg2. Results 120 elective RCs were performed for either gallstone disease (95%) or gallbladder polyps (5%) (DaVinci Xi platform). BMI data was available for 102 of the patients and demonstrated a skew toward overweight and obese patients (16% normal, 23% overweight, 19% class I obese, 14% class II obese, 24% class III obese and 4% class IV obese). No conversion to open was required, but 4 cases with BMI <40 m/kg2 required subtotal cholecystectomy. The complication rates were low and comparable: 4% in the BMI <40 m/kg2 group, versus 3.57% in the BMI >40 m/kg2 group. Overnight admission was required in 25.7% of the BMI <40 m/kg2 group, versus 39.3% in the BMI >40 m/kg2 group. However, the reasons for increased length of stay for the morbidly obese cohort did not relate to surgical complication or patient comorbidity. Conclusions RC may provide a low-risk approach for morbidly obese patients who often present as surgically or anaesthetically challenging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.268
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

229 Robotic Cholecystectomy: Utility in Morbidly Obese Patients

Maitreyi Patel, Samrat Kumar Mukherjee, Joanna Crawley, Mehnaz Ahmed et al.
British journal of surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

229 Robotic Cholecystectomy: Utility in Morbidly Obese Patients

Maitreyi Patel, Samrat Kumar Mukherjee, Joanna Crawley, Mehnaz Ahmed, Seema Yalamanchili, Koza Agha, Dipankar Mukherjee, Megan Bhogal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Minimal data suggest the superiority of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) for outcomes, however robotic surgery may benefit specific patient cohorts, such as the morbidly obese (BMI 40 m/kg2). We present outcomes in RC from a single institution with a significant proportion of patients with class III & IV obesity. Method A retrospective analysis of RCs performed over 30 months was conducted, assessing cases for indicative pathology, complications, length of stay, BMI and comorbidity. Comparison was made between patients with BMI <40 m/kg2 and BMI >40 m/kg2. Results 120 elective RCs were performed for either gallstone disease (95%) or gallbladder polyps (5%) (DaVinci Xi platform). BMI data was available for 102 of the patients and demonstrated a skew toward overweight and obese patients (16% normal, 23% overweight, 19% class I obese, 14% class II obese, 24% class III obese and 4% class IV obese). No conversion to open was required, but 4 cases with BMI <40 m/kg2 required subtotal cholecystectomy. The complication rates were low and comparable: 4% in the BMI <40 m/kg2 group, versus 3.57% in the BMI >40 m/kg2 group. Overnight admission was required in 25.7% of the BMI <40 m/kg2 group, versus 39.3% in the BMI >40 m/kg2 group. However, the reasons for increased length of stay for the morbidly obese cohort did not relate to surgical complication or patient comorbidity. Conclusions RC may provide a low-risk approach for morbidly obese patients who often present as surgically or anaesthetically challenging.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.