OP82 The Opportunity Cost Of Funding High-Cost Medicines: Two Case Studies In Latin America

Introduction Like many Latin American countries, Colombia and the Dominican Republic grapple with the financial burden of covering high-cost medicines (HCMs). While some of these drugs are highly effective, others have reduced clinical effectiveness. Each of these drugs carries an opportunity cost in terms of the health gains lost by allocating these resources elsewhere. We quantified the health opportunity cost of funding HCMs in Colombia and the Dominican Republic. Methods An identification strategy for HCMs was employed in both countries, based on their significant budgetary impact or high cost per case. This resulted in a shortlist of 10 molecules for Colombia and another 10 for the Dominican Republic. The health opportunity costs were estimated using the standard methodology of net health benefit, with the country-specific cost-effectiveness threshold employed as a proxy for average health production per dollar invested in the health systems of the two cases under study. Results The selected HCMs included drugs for cancer, rare diseases, diabetes, and multiple sclerosis. The incremental health gains provided by these drugs were less than two life years in perfect health. In Colombia, funding the analyzed HCMs instead of the best available therapeutic alternatives implied an additional cost of USD642 million for the treatment of 22,155 covered patients. If these resources were allocated to expand services available within the system, the net gain would be 122,507 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In the Dominican Republic, the additional cost was estimated to be USD154 million (14,577 patients), with an estimated opportunity cost of 35,221 QALYs. Conclusions The significant health opportunity costs for two countries with gaps in essential health services highlight the need for policies prioritizing efficient spending. Redirecting resources from the analyzed HCMs to cost-effective essential services could enhance health gains, addressing coverage gaps and advancing progress toward universal health coverage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101360
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP82 The Opportunity Cost Of Funding High-Cost Medicines: Two Case Studies In Latin America

Dan Ollendorf, Marcella Distrutti, Pamela Gongora, Natalia Jörgensen et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

OP82 The Opportunity Cost Of Funding High-Cost Medicines: Two Case Studies In Latin America

Dan Ollendorf, Marcella Distrutti, Pamela Gongora, Natalia Jörgensen, Catalina Gutiérrez, Lucia Bettati, Ursula Giedion, Santiago Palacio
article en

Abstract

Introduction Like many Latin American countries, Colombia and the Dominican Republic grapple with the financial burden of covering high-cost medicines (HCMs). While some of these drugs are highly effective, others have reduced clinical effectiveness. Each of these drugs carries an opportunity cost in terms of the health gains lost by allocating these resources elsewhere. We quantified the health opportunity cost of funding HCMs in Colombia and the Dominican Republic. Methods An identification strategy for HCMs was employed in both countries, based on their significant budgetary impact or high cost per case. This resulted in a shortlist of 10 molecules for Colombia and another 10 for the Dominican Republic. The health opportunity costs were estimated using the standard methodology of net health benefit, with the country-specific cost-effectiveness threshold employed as a proxy for average health production per dollar invested in the health systems of the two cases under study. Results The selected HCMs included drugs for cancer, rare diseases, diabetes, and multiple sclerosis. The incremental health gains provided by these drugs were less than two life years in perfect health. In Colombia, funding the analyzed HCMs instead of the best available therapeutic alternatives implied an additional cost of USD642 million for the treatment of 22,155 covered patients. If these resources were allocated to expand services available within the system, the net gain would be 122,507 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In the Dominican Republic, the additional cost was estimated to be USD154 million (14,577 patients), with an estimated opportunity cost of 35,221 QALYs. Conclusions The significant health opportunity costs for two countries with gaps in essential health services highlight the need for policies prioritizing efficient spending. Redirecting resources from the analyzed HCMs to cost-effective essential services could enhance health gains, addressing coverage gaps and advancing progress toward universal health coverage.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

OP82 The Opportunity Cost Of Funding High-Cost Medicines: Two Case Studies In Latin America — Dan Ollendorf, Marcella Distrutti, et al. · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS