PD20 Evaluation Of Diagnostic Methods For Visceral Leishmaniasis Detection: A Systematic Review

Introduction Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by Leishmania infantum , is a significant public health challenge in the Americas and the Mediterranean basin. Effective disease control requires timely and accurate diagnostic methods, particularly in endemic regions. This study systematically evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the rK39 rapid test, and ELISA with respect to their sensitivity and specificity against parasitological examination across diverse populations. Methods A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases without restrictions on publication date, language, or whether the study was published, unpublished, or ongoing. Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of PCR, the rK39 rapid test, and ELISA for detecting VL against direct parasitological examination were included based on predefined PIROS framework (Population, Index test, Reference standard, Outcomes, and Study design). Study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data were synthesized narratively and through meta-analyses to estimate sensitivity and specificity. Methodological quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results Twenty studies were included. In immunocompetent patients, PCR had high sensitivity (91 to 98.5%) and specificity (up to 100%) for detecting VL, providing a less invasive alternative to bone marrow aspiration. The rK39 test had sensitivity of 82.4 to 97 percent and a specificity close to 100 percent, which is suitable for endemic regions. ELISA sensitivity ranged from 89 to 94 percent. In immunosuppressed patients, PCR retained superior accuracy (83 to 100% sensitivity), while the rK39 sensitivity declined to 60 to 67 percent. Certainty of the evidence was moderate for immunocompetent patients but low for immunosuppressed groups, due to heterogeneity and the limited number of studies. Conclusions PCR was the most accurate method for detecting Leishmania infantum in endemic regions, especially for immunosuppressed patients. The rK39 rapid test was effective for initial screening in high-prevalence areas, and ELISA was helpful in specific contexts. These results emphasize the need for non-invasive, accurate diagnostics. Future studies should address evidence limitations, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101554
Primary Topic
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD20 Evaluation Of Diagnostic Methods For Visceral Leishmaniasis Detection: A Systematic Review

Stéfani Sousa Borges, Mariana Del Grossi, Daniela Melo, Bruna Santos
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
article

PD20 Evaluation Of Diagnostic Methods For Visceral Leishmaniasis Detection: A Systematic Review

Stéfani Sousa Borges, Mariana Del Grossi, Daniela Melo, Bruna Santos
article en

Abstract

Introduction Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by Leishmania infantum , is a significant public health challenge in the Americas and the Mediterranean basin. Effective disease control requires timely and accurate diagnostic methods, particularly in endemic regions. This study systematically evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the rK39 rapid test, and ELISA with respect to their sensitivity and specificity against parasitological examination across diverse populations. Methods A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases without restrictions on publication date, language, or whether the study was published, unpublished, or ongoing. Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of PCR, the rK39 rapid test, and ELISA for detecting VL against direct parasitological examination were included based on predefined PIROS framework (Population, Index test, Reference standard, Outcomes, and Study design). Study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data were synthesized narratively and through meta-analyses to estimate sensitivity and specificity. Methodological quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results Twenty studies were included. In immunocompetent patients, PCR had high sensitivity (91 to 98.5%) and specificity (up to 100%) for detecting VL, providing a less invasive alternative to bone marrow aspiration. The rK39 test had sensitivity of 82.4 to 97 percent and a specificity close to 100 percent, which is suitable for endemic regions. ELISA sensitivity ranged from 89 to 94 percent. In immunosuppressed patients, PCR retained superior accuracy (83 to 100% sensitivity), while the rK39 sensitivity declined to 60 to 67 percent. Certainty of the evidence was moderate for immunocompetent patients but low for immunosuppressed groups, due to heterogeneity and the limited number of studies. Conclusions PCR was the most accurate method for detecting Leishmania infantum in endemic regions, especially for immunosuppressed patients. The rK39 rapid test was effective for initial screening in high-prevalence areas, and ELISA was helpful in specific contexts. These results emphasize the need for non-invasive, accurate diagnostics. Future studies should address evidence limitations, particularly for vulnerable populations.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.