Utilizing People‐Centered Evaluation Approaches to Advance Racial Equity

ABSTRACT Derived from a larger qualitative study examining how social justice‐oriented evaluators conceptualize, operationalize, and advance racial equity and justice in their practice, we draw on the reflective accounts of 29 evaluators to ask: How do social justice‐oriented evaluators center people when aiming to advance racial equity and justice? We consider people‐centered evaluation to be an evaluation that focuses on the needs of the people most impacted in the evaluative context, their engagement with the evaluative process, and recognize how power dynamics, context, history, and systems play a part in people's participation in and view of the evaluation. Our findings offer three strategies: (a) understanding self and context, (b) evaluator responsibilities of pushing back or calling out actions that foster inequities, and (c) relationality in authentic community engagement. This article posits that the work of advancing racial equity cannot be separated from people or communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.70013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilizing People‐Centered Evaluation Approaches to Advance Racial Equity

Cherie M. Avent, Xinru Yan, Rebecca M. Teasdale, Ceily L. Moore et al.
1 citations
New Directions for Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
article

Utilizing People‐Centered Evaluation Approaches to Advance Racial Equity

Cherie M. Avent, Xinru Yan, Rebecca M. Teasdale, Ceily L. Moore, María B. Serrano‐Abreu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Derived from a larger qualitative study examining how social justice‐oriented evaluators conceptualize, operationalize, and advance racial equity and justice in their practice, we draw on the reflective accounts of 29 evaluators to ask: How do social justice‐oriented evaluators center people when aiming to advance racial equity and justice? We consider people‐centered evaluation to be an evaluation that focuses on the needs of the people most impacted in the evaluative context, their engagement with the evaluative process, and recognize how power dynamics, context, history, and systems play a part in people's participation in and view of the evaluation. Our findings offer three strategies: (a) understanding self and context, (b) evaluator responsibilities of pushing back or calling out actions that foster inequities, and (c) relationality in authentic community engagement. This article posits that the work of advancing racial equity cannot be separated from people or communities.

New Directions for EvaluationVol. 2025(188)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois at Chicago
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Utilizing People‐Centered Evaluation Approaches to Advance Racial Equity — Cherie M. Avent, Xinru Yan, et al. · New Directions for Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS