292 Outcomes of NoLap Patients in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit at a Single Tertiary Centre

Abstract Aim The NoLap category of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), introduced in April 2024, captures outcomes for patients presenting with acute bowel ischaemia or perforation in whom emergency surgery was indicated but not performed - either due to the patient’s frailty and high surgical risk or by patient choice. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in this cohort and identify opportunities to improve palliative and end-of-life care. Method We conducted a prospective, single-centre study between February 2024 and February 2025. Adults (≥18years) with radiological evidence of bowel perforation or ischaemia, for whom surgery was indicated but not undertaken due to significant comorbidities or patient preference, were included. Patients who underwent radiological or endoscopic therapeutic interventions were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included multidisciplinary involvement and advance care planning. Results Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly female (94.1%) with a median age of 87 years. The overall mortality rate was 64.7%. The median Clinical Frailty Score was 8, and the mean NELA-predicted mortality was 51.8%. All patients had CT-confirmed diagnoses. On admission, only 41.1% had an advance care plan or DNACPR in place. Following the decision for conservative management, 88.2% received formal input from palliative care or geriatric medicine. Conclusions This early experience highlights a frail and high-risk patient group often underrepresented in audit and quality improvement initiatives. Despite high predicted mortality, proactive end-of-life care planning was often lacking. Early palliative services involvement and structured advance planning are essential to support patient-centred care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.127
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

292 Outcomes of NoLap Patients in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit at a Single Tertiary Centre

Marena Gray, Rehan T. Gamage, Leong Melvin, Stavros Gourgiotis
British journal of surgery
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

292 Outcomes of NoLap Patients in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit at a Single Tertiary Centre

Marena Gray, Rehan T. Gamage, Leong Melvin, Stavros Gourgiotis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim The NoLap category of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), introduced in April 2024, captures outcomes for patients presenting with acute bowel ischaemia or perforation in whom emergency surgery was indicated but not performed - either due to the patient’s frailty and high surgical risk or by patient choice. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in this cohort and identify opportunities to improve palliative and end-of-life care. Method We conducted a prospective, single-centre study between February 2024 and February 2025. Adults (≥18years) with radiological evidence of bowel perforation or ischaemia, for whom surgery was indicated but not undertaken due to significant comorbidities or patient preference, were included. Patients who underwent radiological or endoscopic therapeutic interventions were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included multidisciplinary involvement and advance care planning. Results Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly female (94.1%) with a median age of 87 years. The overall mortality rate was 64.7%. The median Clinical Frailty Score was 8, and the mean NELA-predicted mortality was 51.8%. All patients had CT-confirmed diagnoses. On admission, only 41.1% had an advance care plan or DNACPR in place. Following the decision for conservative management, 88.2% received formal input from palliative care or geriatric medicine. Conclusions This early experience highlights a frail and high-risk patient group often underrepresented in audit and quality improvement initiatives. Despite high predicted mortality, proactive end-of-life care planning was often lacking. Early palliative services involvement and structured advance planning are essential to support patient-centred care.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.