PD53 Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists And Polyagonists For Severe Obesity: Rapid Overview Of Outcomes Measurement

Introduction Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA/pA) drugs are a breakthrough in obesity management. They produce nearly twice the weight loss achieved by previous drugs and have raised clinical expectations. At least nine GLP-1RA/pA drugs are currently approved or in phase three evaluation. This report aimed to provide an overview of evidence on the clinical outcomes of GLP-1RA/pA drugs to assist topic selection for a complete health technology assessment. Methods Exploratory searches were conducted in PubMed, combining the validated database systematic review filter with a structured string for patients with severe obesity (population) and GLP-1RA/pA as the intervention of interest. Inclusion criteria were: (i) systematic reviews with a meta-analysis (SRMA); (ii) severely obese individuals; and (iii) GLP-1RA/pAs as the active intervention. We excluded studies with: (i) children or adolescents only; (ii) any other therapeutic drug class used as an active intervention; (iii) systematic reviews without meta-analyses and other study designs; and (iv) studies in which obesity was not an inclusion criterion. Results Forty SRMAs were included. Liraglutide was the most assessed drug, while beinaglutide was the least commonly assessed. Included patients (mean age 12.7 to 75 years) had a mean body mass index of 23 to 34.4 kg/m²; follow-up times ranged from four to 160 weeks. Of the SRMAs, 39 reported efficacy and safety outcomes, while one reported safety outcomes only. Two SRMAs reported other outcomes (economic outcomes and ethnic diversity of clinical trials). Thirty-four SRMAs included randomized controlled trials and five included observational studies that assessed bariatric surgery poor responders (BSPR). Three reviews performed network comparisons. Specific subgroups of obese populations were assessed in eight reviews (BSPR, ethnically diverse people, and obese patients using antipsychotic drugs). Conclusions While some reviews have explored specific subgroups, there is a gap regarding severe and super obese patients. Few SRMAs have focused on cardiovascular outcomes. Systematic reviews based on real-world evidence and long-term outcomes are limited. Our findings highlight the need for further research to address these gaps and provide more robust evidence for clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101852
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD53 Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists And Polyagonists For Severe Obesity: Rapid Overview Of Outcomes Measurement

Flávia Tavares Silva ELIAS, Thiago Trindade, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Puga
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

PD53 Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists And Polyagonists For Severe Obesity: Rapid Overview Of Outcomes Measurement

Flávia Tavares Silva ELIAS, Thiago Trindade, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Puga
article en

Abstract

Introduction Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA/pA) drugs are a breakthrough in obesity management. They produce nearly twice the weight loss achieved by previous drugs and have raised clinical expectations. At least nine GLP-1RA/pA drugs are currently approved or in phase three evaluation. This report aimed to provide an overview of evidence on the clinical outcomes of GLP-1RA/pA drugs to assist topic selection for a complete health technology assessment. Methods Exploratory searches were conducted in PubMed, combining the validated database systematic review filter with a structured string for patients with severe obesity (population) and GLP-1RA/pA as the intervention of interest. Inclusion criteria were: (i) systematic reviews with a meta-analysis (SRMA); (ii) severely obese individuals; and (iii) GLP-1RA/pAs as the active intervention. We excluded studies with: (i) children or adolescents only; (ii) any other therapeutic drug class used as an active intervention; (iii) systematic reviews without meta-analyses and other study designs; and (iv) studies in which obesity was not an inclusion criterion. Results Forty SRMAs were included. Liraglutide was the most assessed drug, while beinaglutide was the least commonly assessed. Included patients (mean age 12.7 to 75 years) had a mean body mass index of 23 to 34.4 kg/m²; follow-up times ranged from four to 160 weeks. Of the SRMAs, 39 reported efficacy and safety outcomes, while one reported safety outcomes only. Two SRMAs reported other outcomes (economic outcomes and ethnic diversity of clinical trials). Thirty-four SRMAs included randomized controlled trials and five included observational studies that assessed bariatric surgery poor responders (BSPR). Three reviews performed network comparisons. Specific subgroups of obese populations were assessed in eight reviews (BSPR, ethnically diverse people, and obese patients using antipsychotic drugs). Conclusions While some reviews have explored specific subgroups, there is a gap regarding severe and super obese patients. Few SRMAs have focused on cardiovascular outcomes. Systematic reviews based on real-world evidence and long-term outcomes are limited. Our findings highlight the need for further research to address these gaps and provide more robust evidence for clinical practice.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.