32 Assisted Reproductive Technologies and adverse perinatal outcomes: the what, why and how?

Abstract Greater than 200,000 children in the United States are born yearly with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Recent epidemiological studies have suggested that these treatments are associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, preterm labor, preeclampsia and some rare genetic and epigenetic diseases. Given that many ART treatments including in vitro fertilization (IVF) utilize multiple clinical and laboratory interventions to generate a cohort of embryos capable of implantation and development, it is critical to examine each intervention individually in order to assess its relationship, if any, to the described adverse perinatal outcomes. Both human and animal studies can provide us with significant insights into the clinical procedures as well as the molecular mechanisms that may be playing in role in the adverse outcomes associated with IVF. By analyzing these data, we can not only can we modify current protocols to minimize the maternal and neonatal risk, but we can gain understanding of the critical cells and processes that play a role in pregnancy establishment and maintenance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf398.026
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

32 Assisted Reproductive Technologies and adverse perinatal outcomes: the what, why and how?

Maria Gracia Gervasi*
Journal of Animal Science
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

32 Assisted Reproductive Technologies and adverse perinatal outcomes: the what, why and how?

Maria Gracia Gervasi*
article en

Abstract

Abstract Greater than 200,000 children in the United States are born yearly with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Recent epidemiological studies have suggested that these treatments are associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, preterm labor, preeclampsia and some rare genetic and epigenetic diseases. Given that many ART treatments including in vitro fertilization (IVF) utilize multiple clinical and laboratory interventions to generate a cohort of embryos capable of implantation and development, it is critical to examine each intervention individually in order to assess its relationship, if any, to the described adverse perinatal outcomes. Both human and animal studies can provide us with significant insights into the clinical procedures as well as the molecular mechanisms that may be playing in role in the adverse outcomes associated with IVF. By analyzing these data, we can not only can we modify current protocols to minimize the maternal and neonatal risk, but we can gain understanding of the critical cells and processes that play a role in pregnancy establishment and maintenance.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_1)
University of Connecticut (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

32 Assisted Reproductive Technologies and adverse perinatal outcomes: the what, why and how? — Maria Gracia Gervasi* · Journal of Animal Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS