102 The SMART Checklist: A Structured Tool for Reporting Modifications in Upper GI Surgical Innovation

Abstract Aim To present the SMART (Surgical ModificAtion Reporting Tool) checklist for reporting modifications in surgical innovation and outline future directions for its implementation and evaluation in upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery. Method The SMART checklist was developed from a systematic review of modification reporting in IDEAL-cited studies, followed by iterative optimisation through qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, including UGI surgeons. The checklist was refined based on thematic analysis of stakeholder feedback, ensuring its clarity, comprehensiveness, and clinical relevance. Results The SMART checklist provides structured guidance for systematically documenting modifications to innovative surgical procedures and devices, with specific attention to the rationale, timing, context, and impact of both device and procedure changes. It includes summary items to encourage reflection on an innovation’s stability and lessons for shared learning. Stakeholders recognised the checklist’s potential to enhance transparency, reduce research waste, and improve patient safety. Anticipated barriers to implementation include time constraints and the need for integration with existing clinical systems. Facilitators include the checklist’s clarity, stakeholder co-design, and alignment with established reporting standards. Conclusions The SMART checklist addresses a critical gap in UGI surgical innovation by standardising modification reporting. Its adoption is expected to support safer and more efficient innovation, facilitating shared learning across the surgical community. Future work will focus on prospective piloting, electronic integration, and evaluation of its impact on reporting quality and patient outcomes in multiple specialities, including UGI surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.241
Primary Topic
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

102 The SMART Checklist: A Structured Tool for Reporting Modifications in Upper GI Surgical Innovation

Kerry Avery, James Olivier, Natalie Blencowe, Daisy Elliott et al.
British journal of surgery
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
article

102 The SMART Checklist: A Structured Tool for Reporting Modifications in Upper GI Surgical Innovation

Kerry Avery, James Olivier, Natalie Blencowe, Daisy Elliott, Rhiannon Macefield
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim To present the SMART (Surgical ModificAtion Reporting Tool) checklist for reporting modifications in surgical innovation and outline future directions for its implementation and evaluation in upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery. Method The SMART checklist was developed from a systematic review of modification reporting in IDEAL-cited studies, followed by iterative optimisation through qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, including UGI surgeons. The checklist was refined based on thematic analysis of stakeholder feedback, ensuring its clarity, comprehensiveness, and clinical relevance. Results The SMART checklist provides structured guidance for systematically documenting modifications to innovative surgical procedures and devices, with specific attention to the rationale, timing, context, and impact of both device and procedure changes. It includes summary items to encourage reflection on an innovation’s stability and lessons for shared learning. Stakeholders recognised the checklist’s potential to enhance transparency, reduce research waste, and improve patient safety. Anticipated barriers to implementation include time constraints and the need for integration with existing clinical systems. Facilitators include the checklist’s clarity, stakeholder co-design, and alignment with established reporting standards. Conclusions The SMART checklist addresses a critical gap in UGI surgical innovation by standardising modification reporting. Its adoption is expected to support safer and more efficient innovation, facilitating shared learning across the surgical community. Future work will focus on prospective piloting, electronic integration, and evaluation of its impact on reporting quality and patient outcomes in multiple specialities, including UGI surgery.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St James's University Hospital (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.