397 Structural Characteristics Associated with Improved Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Centralisation of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgical services has corresponded with improvements in post-operative outcomes over the last two decades. However, centralisation has been variably implemented, and the specific structural factors that confer benefit remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to summarise current evidence on the structural characteristics associated with quality outcomes following surgery for cancers of the GI tract. Method A systematic search of the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies that evaluated the importance of structure, or individual structural characteristics, in GI cancer surgery. These were categorised into one of: volume/centralisation, hospital infrastructure, personnel/staffing, or standardised care protocols. Outcomes of interest included mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, failure to rescue, readmission and cost. Results Sixty studies were included in the review. Greater hospital, surgeon and anaesthetic operative volume were each associated with improved outcomes. Protocols such as enhanced recovery after surgery contributed to faster peri-operative recovery and shorter hospital length of stay. While evidence on optimal post-operative care team composition was limited, geriatric co-management, physiotherapy, and dietetic input were each found to be important. Conclusions Although increased operative volume following centralisation is associated with improved surgical outcomes, definitions of ‘high-volume’ are variable and operation-specific volume thresholds have yet to be defined. Additional research to establish the ideal demographics of the peri-operative care team is also needed. This likely comprises surgeons, peri-operative physicians, specialist anaesthetists, dieticians, and physiotherapists, with additional on-site support from specialties such as interventional radiology and gastroenterology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.035
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

397 Structural Characteristics Associated with Improved Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

Sarah Epton, David Cromwell, Min Hae Park, Prem Chana et al.
British journal of surgery
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

397 Structural Characteristics Associated with Improved Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

Sarah Epton, David Cromwell, Min Hae Park, Prem Chana, Nikhil Patel, James Gossage, Jesper Lagergren
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Centralisation of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgical services has corresponded with improvements in post-operative outcomes over the last two decades. However, centralisation has been variably implemented, and the specific structural factors that confer benefit remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to summarise current evidence on the structural characteristics associated with quality outcomes following surgery for cancers of the GI tract. Method A systematic search of the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies that evaluated the importance of structure, or individual structural characteristics, in GI cancer surgery. These were categorised into one of: volume/centralisation, hospital infrastructure, personnel/staffing, or standardised care protocols. Outcomes of interest included mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, failure to rescue, readmission and cost. Results Sixty studies were included in the review. Greater hospital, surgeon and anaesthetic operative volume were each associated with improved outcomes. Protocols such as enhanced recovery after surgery contributed to faster peri-operative recovery and shorter hospital length of stay. While evidence on optimal post-operative care team composition was limited, geriatric co-management, physiotherapy, and dietetic input were each found to be important. Conclusions Although increased operative volume following centralisation is associated with improved surgical outcomes, definitions of ‘high-volume’ are variable and operation-specific volume thresholds have yet to be defined. Additional research to establish the ideal demographics of the peri-operative care team is also needed. This likely comprises surgeons, peri-operative physicians, specialist anaesthetists, dieticians, and physiotherapists, with additional on-site support from specialties such as interventional radiology and gastroenterology.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
St Thomas' Hospital (GB), Royal College of Surgeons of England (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), London Cancer (GB), St. Thomas Hospital (CA), Imperial College London (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.