269 Evaluating Outcomes of Feeding Jejunostomy Tubes in Oesophago-Gastric Resection Patients: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience

Abstract Aim Enteral nutrition via jejunostomy tubes remains a critical component of perioperative care in oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer patients. While national practices vary, the NOGCA 2020 guidelines recommend selective use, particularly in high-risk patients or those undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes on basis of type and timing of Feeding jejunostomy tube. Method We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing OG resections at our institution (2023–2024). Data analysis included type of resection, type of tube used (Freka vs MIC) and comparison of groups with and without tube placement. The primary outcome variable was adverse outcome in either group. Results Out of a total of 84 patients undergoing oesophageal (57) resection and gastric resection (27), 50 patients (59.5%) had a tube placement. 18 patients in the tubed group (36.73%) developed complications with the most common ones being infection, leakage, blockage, and dislodgement. Freka tubes placed intra-operatively, were associated with fewer issues compared to MIC tubes. Conclusions Feeding Jejunostomy tubes are effective in selected high-risk patients. Timing and method of placement affect outcomes. Feeding jejunostomy tube improve nutritional recovery with planned tube placement. National OG Cancer Audit cautions against blanket placement. Improving documentation and multidisciplinary nutritional planning remain essential. These findings support national guidance for individualised, evidence-based decision-making in enteral access following OG surgery. Further prospective randomised control studies are warranted to establish superiority of the type and timing of Feeding Jejunostomy tube.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.184
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

269 Evaluating Outcomes of Feeding Jejunostomy Tubes in Oesophago-Gastric Resection Patients: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience

Djenna Chebli, Khalid Akbari, Nameer Faiz, Malik Kayal
British journal of surgery
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

269 Evaluating Outcomes of Feeding Jejunostomy Tubes in Oesophago-Gastric Resection Patients: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience

Djenna Chebli, Khalid Akbari, Nameer Faiz, Malik Kayal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Enteral nutrition via jejunostomy tubes remains a critical component of perioperative care in oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer patients. While national practices vary, the NOGCA 2020 guidelines recommend selective use, particularly in high-risk patients or those undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes on basis of type and timing of Feeding jejunostomy tube. Method We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing OG resections at our institution (2023–2024). Data analysis included type of resection, type of tube used (Freka vs MIC) and comparison of groups with and without tube placement. The primary outcome variable was adverse outcome in either group. Results Out of a total of 84 patients undergoing oesophageal (57) resection and gastric resection (27), 50 patients (59.5%) had a tube placement. 18 patients in the tubed group (36.73%) developed complications with the most common ones being infection, leakage, blockage, and dislodgement. Freka tubes placed intra-operatively, were associated with fewer issues compared to MIC tubes. Conclusions Feeding Jejunostomy tubes are effective in selected high-risk patients. Timing and method of placement affect outcomes. Feeding jejunostomy tube improve nutritional recovery with planned tube placement. National OG Cancer Audit cautions against blanket placement. Improving documentation and multidisciplinary nutritional planning remain essential. These findings support national guidance for individualised, evidence-based decision-making in enteral access following OG surgery. Further prospective randomised control studies are warranted to establish superiority of the type and timing of Feeding Jejunostomy tube.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
University Hospital Coventry (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.