Essential Conflict Measurement in Dempster–Shafer Theory for Intelligent Information Fusion

Dempster’s combination rule in Dempster–Shafer theory is a powerful and effective tool for multi-sensor data fusion. However, counterintuitive results are possible under the condition of a high conflict between pieces of evidence. This study demonstrates that existing conflict measurements cannot prevent such results and, thus, proposes a quantitative conflict measurement based on the concept of essential conflict. This work analyzes two characteristics of the essential conflict, namely belief absolutization and uncorrectable assertions. In addition, considering the desirable properties of the measurement, this study demonstrates that the measurement of essential conflict can reveal the essence of counterintuitive results in Dempster’s combination process. Finally, properties and examples are used to validate the proposed measurement.