Optimal Fining Methods in Cartel Cases: A Systematic Literature Review

This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on optimal fining methods for cartel infringements. Building on the PRISMA 2020 methodology, we analysed forty-seven articles to address three core themes: how optimal fines are defined, the ways different variables are incorporated in quantitative models, and comparative insights. We identified five prevailing approaches: revenuebased, overcharge-based, damages-based, profit-based, and a (recent) sophisticated revenue-based framework blending revenue- and overcharge-based elements. While each method has distinct advantages and challenges, the sophisticated revenue-based approach appears particularly promising in balancing deterrence against proportionality concerns, offering a potential remedy to the shortcomings or implementation issues, found in strictly revenue-based or damages/overcharge-based regimes. This review underlines the importance of aligning fine structures with the overarching policy objective of mitigating wealth transfers from consumers to producers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to map how different strands in extant literature conceive an optimal fine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Competition
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2025031
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Fining Methods in Cartel Cases: A Systematic Literature Review

Marc Jegers, Caroline Buts, Seppe Maes
World Competition
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Optimal Fining Methods in Cartel Cases: A Systematic Literature Review

Marc Jegers, Caroline Buts, Seppe Maes
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on optimal fining methods for cartel infringements. Building on the PRISMA 2020 methodology, we analysed forty-seven articles to address three core themes: how optimal fines are defined, the ways different variables are incorporated in quantitative models, and comparative insights. We identified five prevailing approaches: revenuebased, overcharge-based, damages-based, profit-based, and a (recent) sophisticated revenue-based framework blending revenue- and overcharge-based elements. While each method has distinct advantages and challenges, the sophisticated revenue-based approach appears particularly promising in balancing deterrence against proportionality concerns, offering a potential remedy to the shortcomings or implementation issues, found in strictly revenue-based or damages/overcharge-based regimes. This review underlines the importance of aligning fine structures with the overarching policy objective of mitigating wealth transfers from consumers to producers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to map how different strands in extant literature conceive an optimal fine.

World CompetitionVol. 48(Issue 4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.