PP38 Bevacizumab Biosimilar For Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From A Cochrane Review

Introduction Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy is used in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung and metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab biosimilars have been developed and marketed after the expiration of the reference bevacizumab patent. Equivalence studies have demonstrated that biosimilars are comparable with their reference medicine, but synthesis of the effects and safety is not available to improve clinical decision-making. Methods We performed a Cochrane systematic review and searched main bibliographic (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) and clinical trials databases up to February 2024. We included randomized controlled trials that directly compared adults with non-small cell lung or colorectal cancer receiving either bevacizumab biosimilars or the reference product. When applicable, we combined the results for outcomes using random-effects meta-analyses, including progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, mortality, objective response rate, and serious adverse events. We applied the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. To assess the certainty of evidence for critical and important outcomes, we utilized the GRADE approach. Results We included 23 studies (n=10,639 participants). Most had a high risk of bias due to issues with discontinuation and patient selection. The bevacizumab biosimilar was likely similar to the reference product in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91, 1.09; 5 studies, n=2,660), duration of response (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.37; 1 study, n=762), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.19; 5 studies, n=2,783), mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09; 19 studies, n=9,231), objective response (risk ratio [RR] 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00; 23 studies, n=10,054), and serious adverse events (RR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.03; 23 studies, n=10,619). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was moderate, mainly due to imprecision. Conclusions Moderate certainty evidence indicated that bevacizumab biosimilars are likely similar to the reference biologic drug in terms of efficacy and safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102572
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP38 Bevacizumab Biosimilar For Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From A Cochrane Review

Marcus Silva, Taís Freire Galvão, Annemeri Livinalli, Ivan Zimmermann et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

PP38 Bevacizumab Biosimilar For Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From A Cochrane Review

Marcus Silva, Taís Freire Galvão, Annemeri Livinalli, Ivan Zimmermann, Luciane C. Lopes
article en

Abstract

Introduction Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy is used in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung and metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab biosimilars have been developed and marketed after the expiration of the reference bevacizumab patent. Equivalence studies have demonstrated that biosimilars are comparable with their reference medicine, but synthesis of the effects and safety is not available to improve clinical decision-making. Methods We performed a Cochrane systematic review and searched main bibliographic (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) and clinical trials databases up to February 2024. We included randomized controlled trials that directly compared adults with non-small cell lung or colorectal cancer receiving either bevacizumab biosimilars or the reference product. When applicable, we combined the results for outcomes using random-effects meta-analyses, including progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, mortality, objective response rate, and serious adverse events. We applied the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. To assess the certainty of evidence for critical and important outcomes, we utilized the GRADE approach. Results We included 23 studies (n=10,639 participants). Most had a high risk of bias due to issues with discontinuation and patient selection. The bevacizumab biosimilar was likely similar to the reference product in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91, 1.09; 5 studies, n=2,660), duration of response (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.37; 1 study, n=762), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.19; 5 studies, n=2,783), mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09; 19 studies, n=9,231), objective response (risk ratio [RR] 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00; 23 studies, n=10,054), and serious adverse events (RR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.03; 23 studies, n=10,619). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was moderate, mainly due to imprecision. Conclusions Moderate certainty evidence indicated that bevacizumab biosimilars are likely similar to the reference biologic drug in terms of efficacy and safety.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.