402 Association of Upper Gi Surgery of Gb&i (Augis)/Perioperative Quality Initiative (Poqi) Consensus Statement on Optimisation of Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Oesophagogastric Resections

Abstract Aim A recent National Oeosphagogastric Nutrition Audit in the UK concluded there was a lack of confidence to provide nutritional support at the ‘front end’ of the pathway, a large variation of resource allocation and raised concerns over funding and staffing resource. This multidisciplinary collaborative study aimed to use best available evidence to produce guideline statements and recommendations on optimisation of nutrition in patients undergoing OG resections. Method A modified Delphi process, previously developed by the Peri-Operative Quality Initiative, was employed to develop consensus statements regarding the optimisation of nutrition in patients undergoing elective OG resections for cancer. The POQI board provided approval and independent supervision of the POQI process and meetings. Results Following a multicentre survey, thirty-nine consensus statements were agreed upon over the course of three online POQI conferences. A total of 30 participants took part in the POQI consensus process. The consensus statements covered four subgroups: 1. Nutrition Assessment, 2. Pre-Operative Nutrition Optimisation, 3. Post-Operative Nutrition Optimisation and 4. Nutrition Optimisation in Long Term Survivors. The level of evidence to support each statement was considered and recorded. Areas where evidence was limited, but felt to be critical for further optimisation, were identified as recommendations for research. Conclusions Consensus guidelines to optimise nutrition in patients undergoing OG cancer resections have been developed and refined. These guidelines will facilitate the multidisciplinary team in their goal to improve outcomes for patients undergoing OG resections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.199
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

402 Association of Upper Gi Surgery of Gb&i (Augis)/Perioperative Quality Initiative (Poqi) Consensus Statement on Optimisation of Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Oesophagogastric Resections

Fiona Huddy, Leo R. Brown, Sheraz R. Markar, James Gossage et al.
British journal of surgery
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

402 Association of Upper Gi Surgery of Gb&i (Augis)/Perioperative Quality Initiative (Poqi) Consensus Statement on Optimisation of Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Oesophagogastric Resections

Fiona Huddy, Leo R. Brown, Sheraz R. Markar, James Gossage, P Singh, Jennifer Redfern, Denny Levett, Javed Sultan, Geoffrey Roberts, Mike Grocott, Sivesh Kamarajah, Richard Skipworth
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim A recent National Oeosphagogastric Nutrition Audit in the UK concluded there was a lack of confidence to provide nutritional support at the ‘front end’ of the pathway, a large variation of resource allocation and raised concerns over funding and staffing resource. This multidisciplinary collaborative study aimed to use best available evidence to produce guideline statements and recommendations on optimisation of nutrition in patients undergoing OG resections. Method A modified Delphi process, previously developed by the Peri-Operative Quality Initiative, was employed to develop consensus statements regarding the optimisation of nutrition in patients undergoing elective OG resections for cancer. The POQI board provided approval and independent supervision of the POQI process and meetings. Results Following a multicentre survey, thirty-nine consensus statements were agreed upon over the course of three online POQI conferences. A total of 30 participants took part in the POQI consensus process. The consensus statements covered four subgroups: 1. Nutrition Assessment, 2. Pre-Operative Nutrition Optimisation, 3. Post-Operative Nutrition Optimisation and 4. Nutrition Optimisation in Long Term Survivors. The level of evidence to support each statement was considered and recorded. Areas where evidence was limited, but felt to be critical for further optimisation, were identified as recommendations for research. Conclusions Consensus guidelines to optimise nutrition in patients undergoing OG cancer resections have been developed and refined. These guidelines will facilitate the multidisciplinary team in their goal to improve outcomes for patients undergoing OG resections.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Royal Surrey County Hospital (GB), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB), St. Thomas Hospital (CA), Science Oxford (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.