PP26 Experience In Mitigating Budgetary Impacts Of High Cost Innovations In Uruguay’s Healthcare System Through Partial Disinvestment Actions

Introduction In 2024, 24 therapeutic sites were expanded within the universal coverage provided by the National Resources Fund (FNR) for all users of the National Integrated Health System (SNS), with an annual investment of USD30 million, mainly for the expansion of immunotherapy coverage. The FNR promotes the development of financial coverage regulations, discouraging the use of widely used drugs that could be subject to partial disinvestment within the SNS. Methods An increase in the FNR’s benefits basket was proposed in 2024, focusing on technologies with proven evidence and innovation. This initiative linked health technology evaluations, social and judicial demands, and budgetary impact analyses to determine the required investment. The proposed methodology targeted therapeutic areas where older comparators within the benefits basket could have their indications reduced in consultation with clinical experts, leading to a decrease in investment costs. The relationship between the cost of investment and the cost of disinvesting current technologies was calculated, enabling comparisons between technologies for disinvestment. Results Within the SNS, the FNR’s high cost benefits basket proposed the modification of 12 treatments across 24 therapeutic sites for 2024. Of these 12 treatments, eight had active ingredients already funded by the FNR. In developing the regulations and conducting the budgetary impact analysis, a partial disinvestment of previously funded active ingredients was considered. The cost variation associated with disinvestment was quantified by comparing the costs of investment to the costs of disinvestment. The budgetary quantification showed variations ranging from 1.37 percent of the investment value in lung cancer to 24.5 percent in hepatocarcinoma, with significant heterogeneity among the different services. Conclusions To ensure the sustainability of healthcare systems, it is necessary to have dynamic benefits baskets that facilitate a constant flow of disinvestment alongside investments. The quantification of technologies to be disinvested in the FNR’s experience should not be considered a marginal expense. It is prudent to implement methodologies that encourage disinvestment, thus ensuring the system’s sustainability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102456
Primary Topic
Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP26 Experience In Mitigating Budgetary Impacts Of High Cost Innovations In Uruguay’s Healthcare System Through Partial Disinvestment Actions

Daniel Pedrosa, Valeria Cabrera, Krizia Osterkamp, Eliana Lanzani et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
article

PP26 Experience In Mitigating Budgetary Impacts Of High Cost Innovations In Uruguay’s Healthcare System Through Partial Disinvestment Actions

Daniel Pedrosa, Valeria Cabrera, Krizia Osterkamp, Eliana Lanzani, Diego Scasso, María Porcelli
article en

Abstract

Introduction In 2024, 24 therapeutic sites were expanded within the universal coverage provided by the National Resources Fund (FNR) for all users of the National Integrated Health System (SNS), with an annual investment of USD30 million, mainly for the expansion of immunotherapy coverage. The FNR promotes the development of financial coverage regulations, discouraging the use of widely used drugs that could be subject to partial disinvestment within the SNS. Methods An increase in the FNR’s benefits basket was proposed in 2024, focusing on technologies with proven evidence and innovation. This initiative linked health technology evaluations, social and judicial demands, and budgetary impact analyses to determine the required investment. The proposed methodology targeted therapeutic areas where older comparators within the benefits basket could have their indications reduced in consultation with clinical experts, leading to a decrease in investment costs. The relationship between the cost of investment and the cost of disinvesting current technologies was calculated, enabling comparisons between technologies for disinvestment. Results Within the SNS, the FNR’s high cost benefits basket proposed the modification of 12 treatments across 24 therapeutic sites for 2024. Of these 12 treatments, eight had active ingredients already funded by the FNR. In developing the regulations and conducting the budgetary impact analysis, a partial disinvestment of previously funded active ingredients was considered. The cost variation associated with disinvestment was quantified by comparing the costs of investment to the costs of disinvestment. The budgetary quantification showed variations ranging from 1.37 percent of the investment value in lung cancer to 24.5 percent in hepatocarcinoma, with significant heterogeneity among the different services. Conclusions To ensure the sustainability of healthcare systems, it is necessary to have dynamic benefits baskets that facilitate a constant flow of disinvestment alongside investments. The quantification of technologies to be disinvested in the FNR’s experience should not be considered a marginal expense. It is prudent to implement methodologies that encourage disinvestment, thus ensuring the system’s sustainability.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Health, Education, and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.