OP34 Methodological Approach For Synthesizing Public Consultations To Inform Decision-Making In Health Technology Incorporation in Brazil: A Delphi study

Introduction Public consultations (PCs) are widely used by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, but there is no consensus on methodological procedures for analyzing PCs. We propose a method for analyzing and synthesizing PCs, offering an agile approach, systematic and transparent steps, reproducible aspects, and reliable analyses. The aim of this study was to validate the method. Methods The Delphi technique was used to validate the proposed method in terms of face (applicability and relevance) and content validity (analysis results). The setting included the HTA processes conducted by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). A group of 20 Brazilian experts was invited to participate, each of whom had experience in at least one of the following areas: HTA, social participation, IRaMuTeQ software, or qualitative research. Consensus was defined as at least 70 percent with “agree” or “strongly agree” responses or an interquartile range of one or less. Comments were summarized and categorized thematically. A pilot study was also conducted. Results Fifteen experts participated in the face validity assessment and 14 in the content validity assessment. Both validations achieved over 80 percent consensus in the first round. In face validity, five methodological steps were validated, including corpus analysis, corpus preparation and organization, data mining using IRaMuTeQ software, systematization and interpretation, and synthesis of findings. In content validity, the results were deemed adequate, providing sufficient information to understand PCs. Although this method was used in the Brazilian HTA setting, it can be adapted by different countries. The method provides a way to organize data already collected in HTA PCs, contributing to processes already in use. Conclusions This study validated a method for analyzing and systematizing HTA PCs—the first strategy of this kind. The method proposes a systematic and transparent approach to organizing data collected for HTA agencies. This initial strategy for systematizing PC analyses can support more participatory, agile, and transparent processes that include public perspectives, which can be a challenge in HTA.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325100925
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP34 Methodological Approach For Synthesizing Public Consultations To Inform Decision-Making In Health Technology Incorporation in Brazil: A Delphi study

Everton Nunes da Silva, Viviane Karoline da Silva Carvalho, Jorge Otavio Maia Barreto
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

OP34 Methodological Approach For Synthesizing Public Consultations To Inform Decision-Making In Health Technology Incorporation in Brazil: A Delphi study

Everton Nunes da Silva, Viviane Karoline da Silva Carvalho, Jorge Otavio Maia Barreto
article en

Abstract

Introduction Public consultations (PCs) are widely used by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, but there is no consensus on methodological procedures for analyzing PCs. We propose a method for analyzing and synthesizing PCs, offering an agile approach, systematic and transparent steps, reproducible aspects, and reliable analyses. The aim of this study was to validate the method. Methods The Delphi technique was used to validate the proposed method in terms of face (applicability and relevance) and content validity (analysis results). The setting included the HTA processes conducted by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). A group of 20 Brazilian experts was invited to participate, each of whom had experience in at least one of the following areas: HTA, social participation, IRaMuTeQ software, or qualitative research. Consensus was defined as at least 70 percent with “agree” or “strongly agree” responses or an interquartile range of one or less. Comments were summarized and categorized thematically. A pilot study was also conducted. Results Fifteen experts participated in the face validity assessment and 14 in the content validity assessment. Both validations achieved over 80 percent consensus in the first round. In face validity, five methodological steps were validated, including corpus analysis, corpus preparation and organization, data mining using IRaMuTeQ software, systematization and interpretation, and synthesis of findings. In content validity, the results were deemed adequate, providing sufficient information to understand PCs. Although this method was used in the Brazilian HTA setting, it can be adapted by different countries. The method provides a way to organize data already collected in HTA PCs, contributing to processes already in use. Conclusions This study validated a method for analyzing and systematizing HTA PCs—the first strategy of this kind. The method proposes a systematic and transparent approach to organizing data collected for HTA agencies. This initial strategy for systematizing PC analyses can support more participatory, agile, and transparent processes that include public perspectives, which can be a challenge in HTA.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.