404 Dissect, Resect, Reconstruct: Intra-operative Technical Variation in Open Pancreatoduodenectomy Among UK HPB Surgeons

Abstract Aim To evaluate technical variability in open pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) among hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. Method A national cross-sectional survey was distributed to consultant HPB surgeons across the UK and Ireland. Questions ranged across technical factors including operation type, operative sequence, dissection technique, resection strategy and the three reconstructions. Responses were analysed descriptively. Results 38 responses were received, from across 30 hospitals. 20/38 (52.6%) perform a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) vs 18/38 (47.4%) Whipple’s. Marked variation in operative sequence was seen(n=36), with 24/36 (66.7%) starting with kocherisation. Extent of kocherisation, lesser sac entry and approach to superior mesenteric artery showed marked variation. 19/38 (50%) performed en-bloc cholecystectomy. Division of the stomach was unanimously performed with a stapler, whilst the CBD was divided mostly with the scalpel (18/38,47.4%). The pancreatic neck was more varied, with most using diathermy (25/38,65.8%), with 9/25 (36%) further specifying knife/scissors used to divide the duct. Pancreatico-enterostomy technique varied; most performed modified-Blumgart (14/38,36.8%) or Cattell-Warren (10/38,26.3%). 6/38 (15.8%) specified a PJ technique: 3/38 (7.9%) duct-to-mucosa and 3/38 (7.9%) dunking. 3/38 (7.9%) performed PG and 3/38 (7.9%) highlighted a modifiable technique depending on gland texture and duct size. Internal stents were used by 33/38 (86.8%): mostly infant feeding-tubes (29/38,65.8%) though 5/38 (13.1%) detailed trialing biodegradable stents. Conclusions: This national survey highlights wide variation in keystone-steps of a PD. Whilst such variation may just reflect difference in training and operator preference, further work to understand the impact of such variation on patient outcomes is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.363
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

404 Dissect, Resect, Reconstruct: Intra-operative Technical Variation in Open Pancreatoduodenectomy Among UK HPB Surgeons

Lewis Hall, S Pathak, K. Roberts, Audrey D. Smith et al.
British journal of surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

404 Dissect, Resect, Reconstruct: Intra-operative Technical Variation in Open Pancreatoduodenectomy Among UK HPB Surgeons

Lewis Hall, S Pathak, K. Roberts, Audrey D. Smith, Ollie Pickering
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim To evaluate technical variability in open pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) among hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. Method A national cross-sectional survey was distributed to consultant HPB surgeons across the UK and Ireland. Questions ranged across technical factors including operation type, operative sequence, dissection technique, resection strategy and the three reconstructions. Responses were analysed descriptively. Results 38 responses were received, from across 30 hospitals. 20/38 (52.6%) perform a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) vs 18/38 (47.4%) Whipple’s. Marked variation in operative sequence was seen(n=36), with 24/36 (66.7%) starting with kocherisation. Extent of kocherisation, lesser sac entry and approach to superior mesenteric artery showed marked variation. 19/38 (50%) performed en-bloc cholecystectomy. Division of the stomach was unanimously performed with a stapler, whilst the CBD was divided mostly with the scalpel (18/38,47.4%). The pancreatic neck was more varied, with most using diathermy (25/38,65.8%), with 9/25 (36%) further specifying knife/scissors used to divide the duct. Pancreatico-enterostomy technique varied; most performed modified-Blumgart (14/38,36.8%) or Cattell-Warren (10/38,26.3%). 6/38 (15.8%) specified a PJ technique: 3/38 (7.9%) duct-to-mucosa and 3/38 (7.9%) dunking. 3/38 (7.9%) performed PG and 3/38 (7.9%) highlighted a modifiable technique depending on gland texture and duct size. Internal stents were used by 33/38 (86.8%): mostly infant feeding-tubes (29/38,65.8%) though 5/38 (13.1%) detailed trialing biodegradable stents. Conclusions: This national survey highlights wide variation in keystone-steps of a PD. Whilst such variation may just reflect difference in training and operator preference, further work to understand the impact of such variation on patient outcomes is necessary.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), St James's University Hospital (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.