PP61 Equity As A Criterion For Prioritizing Topics For The Development Of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Introduction Equity is a pivotal element in health technology assessment (HTA) to ensure fair and proportional access to healthcare needs and to mitigate health disparities. The incorporation of equity-oriented prioritization criteria into the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) promotes social justice in health. This study systematically mapped equity-related criteria used to prioritize topics for CPGs. Methods A comprehensive scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute’ Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The review protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework. The review encompassed both peer-reviewed publications and gray literature published from 2000 onwards, without language limitations, that addressed topic prioritization criteria for CPG development. From an initial list of 22,675 records, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. The extracted prioritization criteria were categorized into six domains and further refined into 20 distinct criterion. Results Of the included studies, 48 percent mentioned the criterion “equity relevance”, within the domain of “factors related to the health condition”, and/or “impact on equity/access” within the domain of “potential impact of the intervention”. These criteria were variably characterized, encompassing aspects such as “frequency of inequality-related issues in specific population groups (e.g., children under five years old)”, “inequities in access and specific needs of vulnerable groups”, “potential of the recommendation to reduce or increase health disparities”, “impact on patient autonomy and independence,” and “user perceptions of the CPG.” Conclusions Evaluating equity considerations related to a disease or health condition and the potential of a CPG to mitigate disparities are imperative in the topic prioritization process. Incorporating this approach can optimize resource allocation, enhance care for marginalized groups, promote social justice, reduce health disparities, and foster social cohesion, thereby contributing to public health and societal well-being.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102808
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP61 Equity As A Criterion For Prioritizing Topics For The Development Of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Mônica Cristiane Rodrigues, Tamiê Martins, Adriane Lopes Medeiros Simone, Tainá Saldanha et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PP61 Equity As A Criterion For Prioritizing Topics For The Development Of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Mônica Cristiane Rodrigues, Tamiê Martins, Adriane Lopes Medeiros Simone, Tainá Saldanha, Daniela Melo, Maíra Pereira
article en

Abstract

Introduction Equity is a pivotal element in health technology assessment (HTA) to ensure fair and proportional access to healthcare needs and to mitigate health disparities. The incorporation of equity-oriented prioritization criteria into the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) promotes social justice in health. This study systematically mapped equity-related criteria used to prioritize topics for CPGs. Methods A comprehensive scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute’ Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The review protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework. The review encompassed both peer-reviewed publications and gray literature published from 2000 onwards, without language limitations, that addressed topic prioritization criteria for CPG development. From an initial list of 22,675 records, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. The extracted prioritization criteria were categorized into six domains and further refined into 20 distinct criterion. Results Of the included studies, 48 percent mentioned the criterion “equity relevance”, within the domain of “factors related to the health condition”, and/or “impact on equity/access” within the domain of “potential impact of the intervention”. These criteria were variably characterized, encompassing aspects such as “frequency of inequality-related issues in specific population groups (e.g., children under five years old)”, “inequities in access and specific needs of vulnerable groups”, “potential of the recommendation to reduce or increase health disparities”, “impact on patient autonomy and independence,” and “user perceptions of the CPG.” Conclusions Evaluating equity considerations related to a disease or health condition and the potential of a CPG to mitigate disparities are imperative in the topic prioritization process. Incorporating this approach can optimize resource allocation, enhance care for marginalized groups, promote social justice, reduce health disparities, and foster social cohesion, thereby contributing to public health and societal well-being.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.