PP88 Life Cycle Scientific Advice For Health Technology Assessment In Korea

Introduction Scientific advice (SA) in the process of developing medical devices and technologies (MedTechs) allows manufacturers to target the profile of their production and gain a better understanding of the requirements for approval and reimbursement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SA framework developed by National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) in Korea. Methods We developed the SA program by reviewing all available information regarding the service offered, processes, duration (in weeks), stage of development, types of technologies, and fees. The SA program supports a total of 60 MedTechs per year. By the end of 2023, a total of 150 technologies had participated. We also evaluated participant satisfaction with the SA program after their participation. Results The NECA SA program offers Evidence Preview, Evidence Search Education, Evidence Development Plans with regulatory advice, and Clinical Expert Advice for clinical trial design. The process is flexible, depending on the applicant’s needs, and is completed within 24 weeks, with a final report issued after completion. Stage of development and type of technology are mainly focused on early stages of development (110/150 technologies) and innovative technologies (87/150 technologies). Participant satisfaction with the SA program was more than 90 percent for the past three years. The SAs offered by NCEA are optional, free of charge, confidential, and non-binding. Conclusions This framework helps manufacturers understand the evidence requirements for NECA and other payers. Considering that most MedTechs are in the early stages of development, it is important to develop a target technology profile (TTP) tool to prepare guidelines for MedTech development plans. In addition, there is growing international collaboration between industry and regulatory authorities. It may also be beneficial to engage with specialized consulting institutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646232510305x
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP88 Life Cycle Scientific Advice For Health Technology Assessment In Korea

Wonjung Choi, Jihyun Kang, Yujin Kang, Jieun Choi
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PP88 Life Cycle Scientific Advice For Health Technology Assessment In Korea

Wonjung Choi, Jihyun Kang, Yujin Kang, Jieun Choi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Scientific advice (SA) in the process of developing medical devices and technologies (MedTechs) allows manufacturers to target the profile of their production and gain a better understanding of the requirements for approval and reimbursement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SA framework developed by National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) in Korea. Methods We developed the SA program by reviewing all available information regarding the service offered, processes, duration (in weeks), stage of development, types of technologies, and fees. The SA program supports a total of 60 MedTechs per year. By the end of 2023, a total of 150 technologies had participated. We also evaluated participant satisfaction with the SA program after their participation. Results The NECA SA program offers Evidence Preview, Evidence Search Education, Evidence Development Plans with regulatory advice, and Clinical Expert Advice for clinical trial design. The process is flexible, depending on the applicant’s needs, and is completed within 24 weeks, with a final report issued after completion. Stage of development and type of technology are mainly focused on early stages of development (110/150 technologies) and innovative technologies (87/150 technologies). Participant satisfaction with the SA program was more than 90 percent for the past three years. The SAs offered by NCEA are optional, free of charge, confidential, and non-binding. Conclusions This framework helps manufacturers understand the evidence requirements for NECA and other payers. Considering that most MedTechs are in the early stages of development, it is important to develop a target technology profile (TTP) tool to prepare guidelines for MedTech development plans. In addition, there is growing international collaboration between industry and regulatory authorities. It may also be beneficial to engage with specialized consulting institutions.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.