A Ladder of Investment to Competition for Online Search Services

Online search has long been dominated by Google Search. In several competition and regulatory proceedings across the globe, various remedies to increase competition are being discussed, including data sharing obligations or a ban on the exclusive default settings of Google Search. A key factor for the success of any remedy package will be the ability of competitors to add value by differentiating their services from Google Search. Up to now, almost all search engine competitors depend on Google’s or Microsoft’s search results by means of syndication agreements, as they cannot feasibly set up their own search engine infrastructure from scratch. To allow market entry and growth across all sections of the search value chain, the remedy package must enable competitors to build up their own infrastructure step by step, in accordance with the success of their market entry. The article outlines how the Ladder of Investment approach, successfully implemented in the telecommunications sector, can be applied to this end. The paper aims to provide guidance on how such a regulatory approach could be implemented either by means of new statutory regulations, such as in the United Kingdom, or through remedies imposed in competition cases on the monopolization of search services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Competition
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2025034
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Ladder of Investment to Competition for Online Search Services

Steffen Uphues, Thomas Hoppner
World Competition
Intellectual Property Law
article

A Ladder of Investment to Competition for Online Search Services

Steffen Uphues, Thomas Hoppner
article en

Abstract

Online search has long been dominated by Google Search. In several competition and regulatory proceedings across the globe, various remedies to increase competition are being discussed, including data sharing obligations or a ban on the exclusive default settings of Google Search. A key factor for the success of any remedy package will be the ability of competitors to add value by differentiating their services from Google Search. Up to now, almost all search engine competitors depend on Google’s or Microsoft’s search results by means of syndication agreements, as they cannot feasibly set up their own search engine infrastructure from scratch. To allow market entry and growth across all sections of the search value chain, the remedy package must enable competitors to build up their own infrastructure step by step, in accordance with the success of their market entry. The article outlines how the Ladder of Investment approach, successfully implemented in the telecommunications sector, can be applied to this end. The paper aims to provide guidance on how such a regulatory approach could be implemented either by means of new statutory regulations, such as in the United Kingdom, or through remedies imposed in competition cases on the monopolization of search services.

World CompetitionVol. 48(Issue 4)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.