118 The Rolling Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Management of Gallstone Ileus

Abstract Aim Gallstone ileus is a rare but serious complication caused by gallstones entering the gastrointestinal tract, often necessitating surgical intervention. Surgical options include enterolithotomy alone, enterolithotomy combined with cholecystectomy, and enterolithotomy with fistula closure. However, there is no consensus on which approach yields the best outcomes regarding mortality, morbidity, and operative time. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare these surgical strategies. Method Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed across Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed for studies published after 2000. Two reviewers independently screened eligible studies and extracted relevant data. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Ten studies including 293 patients were included. Primary outcomes analysed were mortality and morbidity; secondary outcome was operative time. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated using fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I² and τ² statistics. Subgroup analyses explored differences among surgical approaches. Results Combined enterolithotomy and cholecystectomy was associated with significantly lower mortality (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.87–3.04; I² = 33%) compared to enterolithotomy alone (OR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.36–7.02; I² = 69%). Enterolithotomy with fistula repair demonstrated the highest morbidity risk (OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 3.38–7.14; I² = 0%). Operative time was significantly longer for combined procedures (MD: 62.47 minutes; 95% CI: 60.14–64.81). Subgroup differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conclusions Enterolithotomy combined with cholecystectomy may improve mortality despite increased operative duration. These findings support tailored surgical approaches and highlight the need for prospective studies to determine optimal management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.316
Primary Topic
Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

118 The Rolling Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Management of Gallstone Ileus

Kejal Patel, Viraj Shah, Poyyamozhi Rajagopal, Adele Zacken et al.
British journal of surgery
Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
article

118 The Rolling Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Management of Gallstone Ileus

Kejal Patel, Viraj Shah, Poyyamozhi Rajagopal, Adele Zacken, Mohamad Silmi, Murtuza Aliasgar Calcuttawala, Luis Aguilar, Deelan Vadher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Gallstone ileus is a rare but serious complication caused by gallstones entering the gastrointestinal tract, often necessitating surgical intervention. Surgical options include enterolithotomy alone, enterolithotomy combined with cholecystectomy, and enterolithotomy with fistula closure. However, there is no consensus on which approach yields the best outcomes regarding mortality, morbidity, and operative time. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare these surgical strategies. Method Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed across Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed for studies published after 2000. Two reviewers independently screened eligible studies and extracted relevant data. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Ten studies including 293 patients were included. Primary outcomes analysed were mortality and morbidity; secondary outcome was operative time. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated using fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I² and τ² statistics. Subgroup analyses explored differences among surgical approaches. Results Combined enterolithotomy and cholecystectomy was associated with significantly lower mortality (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.87–3.04; I² = 33%) compared to enterolithotomy alone (OR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.36–7.02; I² = 69%). Enterolithotomy with fistula repair demonstrated the highest morbidity risk (OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 3.38–7.14; I² = 0%). Operative time was significantly longer for combined procedures (MD: 62.47 minutes; 95% CI: 60.14–64.81). Subgroup differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conclusions Enterolithotomy combined with cholecystectomy may improve mortality despite increased operative duration. These findings support tailored surgical approaches and highlight the need for prospective studies to determine optimal management.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.