OP66 Assessment Of Patient And Public Involvement Reporting In Health Technology Assessment Documents In Brazil (2023 To 2024)

Introduction Patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly valued globally but remains challenging, particularly in Brazil. Reporting tools like the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public Short Form (GRIPP2-SF) help assess and enhance public participation efforts. This study evaluated the reporting of HTA documents published by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of technical reports published by CONITEC between 1 January 2023 and 29 November 2024. We collected characterization data from reports that included the perspective of patients (PP) or public consultation (CP) item, in addition to the challenges for social participation. We used the GRIPP2-SF reporting guide, which has five items and aims to improve the quality of reporting on patient and public involvement in health and social care research. We performed a descriptive analysis of the data, presenting them as percentages and averages. Results A total of 131 reports were evaluated, with 12,449 registered participants. Four documents did not include any social participation. Of the reports, 83 (63.3%) addressed the PP item and 48 (36.6%) addressed the PC item. The average duration of the public call was 13 days for PP and 18 days for PC. The experience report for the PP item was collected by consensus or random selection among patients. Challenges to social participation included lack of registration in the public call and failure to meet the inclusion criteria. Only the GRIPP2-SF “objectives, methods and results” items were described. Conclusions Application of GRIPP-2F in the critical evaluation of patient involvement highlighted the importance of continuing to investigate dynamic and simple approaches to patient integration into HTA reports. Including patients after the report is completed should not be the end point but a trigger for incorporating them throughout the process in future projects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101232
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP66 Assessment Of Patient And Public Involvement Reporting In Health Technology Assessment Documents In Brazil (2023 To 2024)

Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto, Aléxia Vieira, Álvaro Atallah, Amanda Assis et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

OP66 Assessment Of Patient And Public Involvement Reporting In Health Technology Assessment Documents In Brazil (2023 To 2024)

Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto, Aléxia Vieira, Álvaro Atallah, Amanda Assis, Aline Rocha
article en

Abstract

Introduction Patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly valued globally but remains challenging, particularly in Brazil. Reporting tools like the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public Short Form (GRIPP2-SF) help assess and enhance public participation efforts. This study evaluated the reporting of HTA documents published by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of technical reports published by CONITEC between 1 January 2023 and 29 November 2024. We collected characterization data from reports that included the perspective of patients (PP) or public consultation (CP) item, in addition to the challenges for social participation. We used the GRIPP2-SF reporting guide, which has five items and aims to improve the quality of reporting on patient and public involvement in health and social care research. We performed a descriptive analysis of the data, presenting them as percentages and averages. Results A total of 131 reports were evaluated, with 12,449 registered participants. Four documents did not include any social participation. Of the reports, 83 (63.3%) addressed the PP item and 48 (36.6%) addressed the PC item. The average duration of the public call was 13 days for PP and 18 days for PC. The experience report for the PP item was collected by consensus or random selection among patients. Challenges to social participation included lack of registration in the public call and failure to meet the inclusion criteria. Only the GRIPP2-SF “objectives, methods and results” items were described. Conclusions Application of GRIPP-2F in the critical evaluation of patient involvement highlighted the importance of continuing to investigate dynamic and simple approaches to patient integration into HTA reports. Including patients after the report is completed should not be the end point but a trigger for incorporating them throughout the process in future projects.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.