PP06 Exploring Domains And Approaches In Medical Device Technology Evaluation: A Systematic Review

Introduction Medical device technology evaluation has advanced significantly in recent years. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the main domains used globally for the evaluation of these technologies and considering the perspective of technology adoption in healthcare systems. Methods Structured searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, the Virtual Health Library, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases using the terms “medical technology” OR “medical device” OR “equipment and supplies” AND “health technology assessment” OR “biomedical technology assessments” for studies published between January 2017 and May 2023, excluding those on specific technologies or audiences. Documents from the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and databases from the World Health Organization were also included. Study selection, extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The term “domain” in this systematic review was inspired by the EUnetHTA Core Model. Results A total of 5,790 studies were retrieved, with 41 meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings were grouped into eight domains, with percentages based on the selected articles (n=41; 100%): (i) safety (n=17; 41%); (ii) efficacy (n=18; 44%); (iii) health problem, current use of technology, and innovation (n=17; 41%); (iv) legal aspects (n=28; 68%); (iv) organizational benefits (n=17; 41%); (vi) description and technical characteristics of the technology (n=30; 73%); (vii) costs and economic evaluation (n=24; 58%); and (viii) social participation (n=11; 27%). Most articles (80%) were of European origin. Conclusions Due to the diversity of medical devices, a single methodological guideline may not cover all their specificities. Studies suggested grouping by technological characteristics to standardize the process. We highlight the importance of exploring less discussed domains, such as social participation and organizational benefits, which represent future topics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102262
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP06 Exploring Domains And Approaches In Medical Device Technology Evaluation: A Systematic Review

Vânia Cristina Canuto Santos, Leidy Anne Teixeira, Daiana Laurenci Orth Blas, Fotini Santos Toscas
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

PP06 Exploring Domains And Approaches In Medical Device Technology Evaluation: A Systematic Review

Vânia Cristina Canuto Santos, Leidy Anne Teixeira, Daiana Laurenci Orth Blas, Fotini Santos Toscas
article en

Abstract

Introduction Medical device technology evaluation has advanced significantly in recent years. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the main domains used globally for the evaluation of these technologies and considering the perspective of technology adoption in healthcare systems. Methods Structured searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, the Virtual Health Library, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases using the terms “medical technology” OR “medical device” OR “equipment and supplies” AND “health technology assessment” OR “biomedical technology assessments” for studies published between January 2017 and May 2023, excluding those on specific technologies or audiences. Documents from the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and databases from the World Health Organization were also included. Study selection, extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The term “domain” in this systematic review was inspired by the EUnetHTA Core Model. Results A total of 5,790 studies were retrieved, with 41 meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings were grouped into eight domains, with percentages based on the selected articles (n=41; 100%): (i) safety (n=17; 41%); (ii) efficacy (n=18; 44%); (iii) health problem, current use of technology, and innovation (n=17; 41%); (iv) legal aspects (n=28; 68%); (iv) organizational benefits (n=17; 41%); (vi) description and technical characteristics of the technology (n=30; 73%); (vii) costs and economic evaluation (n=24; 58%); and (viii) social participation (n=11; 27%). Most articles (80%) were of European origin. Conclusions Due to the diversity of medical devices, a single methodological guideline may not cover all their specificities. Studies suggested grouping by technological characteristics to standardize the process. We highlight the importance of exploring less discussed domains, such as social participation and organizational benefits, which represent future topics.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.