OP11 How Has Structured Expert Elicitation Been Used To Provide Evidence For Holistic Value Elements In Health Technology Assessments?

Introduction Structured expert elicitation (SEE) is a method of formally collecting expert opinions and beliefs using a statistical framework that can be used to generate qualitative data for health technology assessment (HTA). SEE is a particularly useful strategy for rare diseases and innovative technologies, where clinical trial data can be subject to additional uncertainty. Methods To investigate how SEE evidence has been used in HTA submissions for rare diseases, a targeted literature search was conducted to identify relevant submissions to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK via the highly specialized technology (HST) pathway. HST reports were screened to ensure that the company submission documents were publicly available and that details of any SEE studies were included. Fields of extraction included the methods used by SEE, the value drivers that SEE data justified, and the consideration of such evidence by the NICE decision-making committee in the final appraisal document (FAD). Results All 27 submissions included in the final analysis leveraged SEE; eight submissions used two SEE methods, and 11 submissions used three methods. The most popular method was semi-structured interviews (81%), followed by surveys (59%), advisory boards (33%), and Delphi panels (26%). The majority of SEE evidence supported core value elements such as quality-adjusted life years (81%). However, SEE evidence was also used to support innovative value elements including family spillover (59%) and productivity (29%). Expert evidence was assessed in the majority of FADs but was accepted mostly when supporting core value elements. Conclusions Commonalities in submissions that successfully leveraged SEE to support holistic value elements included providing clear justification for why the data could not be sourced elsewhere, conducting multiple formats of expert engagement, recruiting large samples of experts, and including a detailed overview of the SEE study design. Manufacturers should consider these critical success factors when including SEE in evidence generation strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325100706
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP11 How Has Structured Expert Elicitation Been Used To Provide Evidence For Holistic Value Elements In Health Technology Assessments?

Smarth Lakhanpal, Ally Robert
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

OP11 How Has Structured Expert Elicitation Been Used To Provide Evidence For Holistic Value Elements In Health Technology Assessments?

Smarth Lakhanpal, Ally Robert
article en

Abstract

Introduction Structured expert elicitation (SEE) is a method of formally collecting expert opinions and beliefs using a statistical framework that can be used to generate qualitative data for health technology assessment (HTA). SEE is a particularly useful strategy for rare diseases and innovative technologies, where clinical trial data can be subject to additional uncertainty. Methods To investigate how SEE evidence has been used in HTA submissions for rare diseases, a targeted literature search was conducted to identify relevant submissions to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK via the highly specialized technology (HST) pathway. HST reports were screened to ensure that the company submission documents were publicly available and that details of any SEE studies were included. Fields of extraction included the methods used by SEE, the value drivers that SEE data justified, and the consideration of such evidence by the NICE decision-making committee in the final appraisal document (FAD). Results All 27 submissions included in the final analysis leveraged SEE; eight submissions used two SEE methods, and 11 submissions used three methods. The most popular method was semi-structured interviews (81%), followed by surveys (59%), advisory boards (33%), and Delphi panels (26%). The majority of SEE evidence supported core value elements such as quality-adjusted life years (81%). However, SEE evidence was also used to support innovative value elements including family spillover (59%) and productivity (29%). Expert evidence was assessed in the majority of FADs but was accepted mostly when supporting core value elements. Conclusions Commonalities in submissions that successfully leveraged SEE to support holistic value elements included providing clear justification for why the data could not be sourced elsewhere, conducting multiple formats of expert engagement, recruiting large samples of experts, and including a detailed overview of the SEE study design. Manufacturers should consider these critical success factors when including SEE in evidence generation strategies.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

OP11 How Has Structured Expert Elicitation Been Used To Provide Evidence For Holistic Value Elements In Health Technology Assessments? — Smarth Lakhanpal, Ally Robert · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS