Comparative Study between Interlaminar Endoscopic versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Treatment of Sciatica

BACKGROUND: One of the most common reasons for sciatica is disc herniation, which is disc leakage (nucleus pulposus) into the surrounding neural tissue because of cracks in the annulus fibrosus. Disc degeneration, which the individual’s spine experiences throughout the course of their lifetime because of mechanical stress, is the root cause of these fissures. The first line of treatment of sciatica is conservative. Failed medical treatment for more than 6 weeks indicates surgical intervention. Surgical treatment of sciatica is now minimally invasive either endoscopic or microscopic.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate inter-laminar endoscopic and microscopic lumbar discectomy procedures for the surgical treatment of sciatica caused by herniated lumbar discs.METHODS: Fifty patients were studied retrospectively during the period January 2023 to June 2024, with 6 months follow-up duration. Twenty-five patients underwent inter-laminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and another 25 patients underwent microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD).RESULTS: Both groups I and II had high levels of pre-operative pain (Lower limb and LBP). All cases in both groups had a smooth and uneventful surgery except 1 case in each group that developed a small dural tear, without postoperative CSF leakage. Group I recovered functionally more quickly and had a shorter hospital stay, with 80% being discharged within the 1st post-operative day.CONCLUSION: When it comes to treating sciatica caused by a single level postero-lateral lumbar disc herniation (LDH), there are 2 effective surgical options; inter-laminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD). The IELD has faster recovery (modified Oswestry disability index (ODI) 4.0 ± 2.58 compared to 4.15 ± 3.37 in MLD), and less tissue damage (intra-operative blood loss 14 ± 0.4 milliliters (mL) compared to 30 ± 0.7 mL in MLD). On the other hand, MLD is a dependable and standardized technique that yields similar results. It may be preferred in cases that require extensive decompression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery/Pan arab journal of neurosurgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/pajn.2025.363577.1172
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Interlaminar Endoscopic versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Treatment of Sciatica

Roshdy Elkhayat, Ahmed Ismail, Mahmoud Mohammed Gamal
Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery/Pan arab journal of neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparative Study between Interlaminar Endoscopic versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Treatment of Sciatica

Roshdy Elkhayat, Ahmed Ismail, Mahmoud Mohammed Gamal
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most common reasons for sciatica is disc herniation, which is disc leakage (nucleus pulposus) into the surrounding neural tissue because of cracks in the annulus fibrosus. Disc degeneration, which the individual’s spine experiences throughout the course of their lifetime because of mechanical stress, is the root cause of these fissures. The first line of treatment of sciatica is conservative. Failed medical treatment for more than 6 weeks indicates surgical intervention. Surgical treatment of sciatica is now minimally invasive either endoscopic or microscopic.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate inter-laminar endoscopic and microscopic lumbar discectomy procedures for the surgical treatment of sciatica caused by herniated lumbar discs.METHODS: Fifty patients were studied retrospectively during the period January 2023 to June 2024, with 6 months follow-up duration. Twenty-five patients underwent inter-laminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and another 25 patients underwent microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD).RESULTS: Both groups I and II had high levels of pre-operative pain (Lower limb and LBP). All cases in both groups had a smooth and uneventful surgery except 1 case in each group that developed a small dural tear, without postoperative CSF leakage. Group I recovered functionally more quickly and had a shorter hospital stay, with 80% being discharged within the 1st post-operative day.CONCLUSION: When it comes to treating sciatica caused by a single level postero-lateral lumbar disc herniation (LDH), there are 2 effective surgical options; inter-laminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD). The IELD has faster recovery (modified Oswestry disability index (ODI) 4.0 ± 2.58 compared to 4.15 ± 3.37 in MLD), and less tissue damage (intra-operative blood loss 14 ± 0.4 milliliters (mL) compared to 30 ± 0.7 mL in MLD). On the other hand, MLD is a dependable and standardized technique that yields similar results. It may be preferred in cases that require extensive decompression.

Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery/Pan arab journal of neurosurgeryVol. 20(2)
Assiut University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.