Performance Comparison of STPV and Split Louvers in Hot Arid Climates

Façade systems in hot, high-insolation climates are required to simultaneously mitigate cooling loads, ensure high-quality daylight, and, where feasible, harvest on-site electricity demands that are often in tension. This study assesses and compares two efficient façade strategies for a fully glazed office prototype in Hail, Saudi Arabia: semi-transparent photovoltaic glazing (STPV10–30%VLT) and parametrically tuned split louvers (18 depth–spacing–tilt configurations). Using a unified parametric workflow (Rhino/Grasshopper), Radiance/honeybee for daylight metrics, ASHRAE-55 heat-balance metrics for thermal comfort, and EnergyPlus for end-use and PV yield, to evaluate annual and solstice performance across cardinal orientations. Optimized split louvers maintained UDI300–1000lx and effectively suppress glare, but incur substantial lighting-energy penalties. In contrast, STPV with 10–20% VLT broadly meets daylight targets while strongly reducing cooling and lighting demand, delivering whole-façade energy savings of up to 50–94% depending on orientation, but could be net-neutral to slightly adverse north 3% when daylight penalties dominate. Thermal comfort responses mirrored these trends: summer PMV was near 0 to +0.5 for both systems, with winter under-heating evident when solar gains are strongly suppressed. Overall, in hot-arid, highly glazed offices, STPV of 10–20%VLT provides the most balanced triad of daylight quality, cooling reduction, and net energy benefit, while optimized louvers excel where glare control is paramount but require careful daylight-control integration.