OP43 Co-Creation Of An Evidence-Based Tool To Assess Health Applications To Manage Depression (EvalDepApps Project)

Introduction The use of apps represents a revolution in mental health because they are fast, versatile, manageable, available twenty-four seven, empower patients and professionals, and can reduce stigmatization. However, there is not yet a standardized method to assess effectiveness and safety. The objective of the EvalDepApps project is to develop an evidence-based tool to evaluate apps whose main aim is to manage depression. Methods The EvalDepApps project followed several stages: (i) identification of health apps for depression through systematic mapping of the marketplaces; (ii) analysis of effectiveness of mobile health interventions for treating depression through a meta-analysis; (iii) identification by healthcare professionals and users (n=30) of a set of criteria to specifically evaluate apps for depression through a two-round modified Delphi study; and (iv) identification of requirements to be implemented in the EvalDepApps tool through co-creation workshops (design thinking methodology) in three settings (17 healthcare professionals and 13 patients). Currently, the app is being piloted by 15 healthcare professionals and 15 patients. Results Thirty apps were identified in marketplaces. Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed the most common elements in digital health interventions, the significant effect of mobile health interventions in reducing symptoms (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.87, −0.37; I 2 =87%), and that hybrid interventions (mobile health plus face-to-face sessions) were the most effective. The Delphi study was based on 51 criteria and reached consensus in 28 criteria; co-creation workshops identified elements of interest for end users (ranking of the apps and recommendation systems). All these elements have been implemented in the EvalDepApps tool, which is being piloted currently. Conclusions Mobile health interventions can be effective in reducing depressive symptoms. It is important to standardize evaluation tools to identify which are the most effective. A human-centered approach improves app engagement and effectiveness. Thanks to inputs given by professionals and patients, together with existing evidence, EvalDepApps will be a tool to assess health apps based on a robust methodological approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101013
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP43 Co-Creation Of An Evidence-Based Tool To Assess Health Applications To Manage Depression (EvalDepApps Project)

Sonia Moretó Melero, Josep Vidal‐Alaball, Corpus Gómez-Calderón, Daniela Cabutto et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

OP43 Co-Creation Of An Evidence-Based Tool To Assess Health Applications To Manage Depression (EvalDepApps Project)

Sonia Moretó Melero, Josep Vidal‐Alaball, Corpus Gómez-Calderón, Daniela Cabutto, Meritxell Davins-Riu, Carme Carrion, Aïna Fuster-Casanovas, Noemí Robles, Estel Estel Gelabert, Janaina Ferreira Cavalcanti, Andrea Duarte-Díaz, Antoni Pérez-Navarro
article en

Abstract

Introduction The use of apps represents a revolution in mental health because they are fast, versatile, manageable, available twenty-four seven, empower patients and professionals, and can reduce stigmatization. However, there is not yet a standardized method to assess effectiveness and safety. The objective of the EvalDepApps project is to develop an evidence-based tool to evaluate apps whose main aim is to manage depression. Methods The EvalDepApps project followed several stages: (i) identification of health apps for depression through systematic mapping of the marketplaces; (ii) analysis of effectiveness of mobile health interventions for treating depression through a meta-analysis; (iii) identification by healthcare professionals and users (n=30) of a set of criteria to specifically evaluate apps for depression through a two-round modified Delphi study; and (iv) identification of requirements to be implemented in the EvalDepApps tool through co-creation workshops (design thinking methodology) in three settings (17 healthcare professionals and 13 patients). Currently, the app is being piloted by 15 healthcare professionals and 15 patients. Results Thirty apps were identified in marketplaces. Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed the most common elements in digital health interventions, the significant effect of mobile health interventions in reducing symptoms (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.87, −0.37; I 2 =87%), and that hybrid interventions (mobile health plus face-to-face sessions) were the most effective. The Delphi study was based on 51 criteria and reached consensus in 28 criteria; co-creation workshops identified elements of interest for end users (ranking of the apps and recommendation systems). All these elements have been implemented in the EvalDepApps tool, which is being piloted currently. Conclusions Mobile health interventions can be effective in reducing depressive symptoms. It is important to standardize evaluation tools to identify which are the most effective. A human-centered approach improves app engagement and effectiveness. Thanks to inputs given by professionals and patients, together with existing evidence, EvalDepApps will be a tool to assess health apps based on a robust methodological approach.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.