Hybrid, Online, or In-Person Teaching: Exploring Teacher Satisfaction Across Instructional Modalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced significant shifts in educational delivery, leading to widespread adoption of hybrid and remote instructional modalities. This study investigates the relationship between these modalities and teacher job satisfaction during the 2020–2022 academic year in the U.S., while also examining how teacher, classroom, and school characteristics predict satisfaction within each modality. Using data from the 2020–2022 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS) on 31,160 full-time public school teachers, linear regression analyses were employed to assess the relationship between instructional modalities and a composite measure of teacher satisfaction, controlling for various teacher, classroom, and school characteristics. The analysis revealed that hybrid teaching was significantly associated with lower teacher satisfaction compared to in-person teaching; however, remote teaching’s initial association with lower satisfaction became non-significant after accounting for school-level factors. Specific teacher characteristics (e.g., female, experienced, younger, holding an advanced degree) and school characteristics (e.g., school level, size, student characteristics) exhibited varying associations with satisfaction across modalities. These findings suggest that hybrid teaching posed unique challenges during the pandemic and highlight the importance of understanding modality-specific risk factors to inform targeted support for teachers in future crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010032
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid, Online, or In-Person Teaching: Exploring Teacher Satisfaction Across Instructional Modalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic

David S. Woo, Yongmei Ni, Adel Arghand
Education Sciences
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Hybrid, Online, or In-Person Teaching: Exploring Teacher Satisfaction Across Instructional Modalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic

David S. Woo, Yongmei Ni, Adel Arghand
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced significant shifts in educational delivery, leading to widespread adoption of hybrid and remote instructional modalities. This study investigates the relationship between these modalities and teacher job satisfaction during the 2020–2022 academic year in the U.S., while also examining how teacher, classroom, and school characteristics predict satisfaction within each modality. Using data from the 2020–2022 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS) on 31,160 full-time public school teachers, linear regression analyses were employed to assess the relationship between instructional modalities and a composite measure of teacher satisfaction, controlling for various teacher, classroom, and school characteristics. The analysis revealed that hybrid teaching was significantly associated with lower teacher satisfaction compared to in-person teaching; however, remote teaching’s initial association with lower satisfaction became non-significant after accounting for school-level factors. Specific teacher characteristics (e.g., female, experienced, younger, holding an advanced degree) and school characteristics (e.g., school level, size, student characteristics) exhibited varying associations with satisfaction across modalities. These findings suggest that hybrid teaching posed unique challenges during the pandemic and highlight the importance of understanding modality-specific risk factors to inform targeted support for teachers in future crises.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
University of Utah (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.