The Abraham Accords and the Strategic Reshaping of the Middle Eastern Order: A Postcolonial and Settler-Colonial Analysis from the Palestinian Perspective

This article examines the 2020 Abraham Accords as a turning point in Arab–Israeli diplomacy and a strategic reshaping of the Middle Eastern order. Through qualitative comparison with Camp David, Oslo, and Wadi Araba, it shows that normalisation has been detached from any commitment to Palestinian statehood and instead anchored in shared threat perceptions (especially Iran), economic diversification, and U.S.-backed realignment. Using postcolonial and settler-colonial theory, the study interprets the Accords as reproducing colonial hierarchies of power and discourse, legitimising Israel's settler project, and further marginalising Palestinian agency. Document analysis and critical discourse analysis of official texts, policy debates, and societal reactions indicate that the Accords weakened Arab collective leverage on Palestine, eroded prospects for a just two-state settlement, and provoked rising popular resistance to normalisation after Gaza. The article concludes that any stability produced by the Accords is fragile unless Palestinian rights and decolonial justice are meaningfully centred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Abraham Accords and the Strategic Reshaping of the Middle Eastern Order: A Postcolonial and Settler-Colonial Analysis from the Palestinian Perspective

Khurram Shahzad Siddiqui
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

The Abraham Accords and the Strategic Reshaping of the Middle Eastern Order: A Postcolonial and Settler-Colonial Analysis from the Palestinian Perspective

Khurram Shahzad Siddiqui
article en

Abstract

This article examines the 2020 Abraham Accords as a turning point in Arab–Israeli diplomacy and a strategic reshaping of the Middle Eastern order. Through qualitative comparison with Camp David, Oslo, and Wadi Araba, it shows that normalisation has been detached from any commitment to Palestinian statehood and instead anchored in shared threat perceptions (especially Iran), economic diversification, and U.S.-backed realignment. Using postcolonial and settler-colonial theory, the study interprets the Accords as reproducing colonial hierarchies of power and discourse, legitimising Israel's settler project, and further marginalising Palestinian agency. Document analysis and critical discourse analysis of official texts, policy debates, and societal reactions indicate that the Accords weakened Arab collective leverage on Palestine, eroded prospects for a just two-state settlement, and provoked rising popular resistance to normalisation after Gaza. The article concludes that any stability produced by the Accords is fragile unless Palestinian rights and decolonial justice are meaningfully centred.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
National Defence University (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Abraham Accords and the Strategic Reshaping of the Middle Eastern Order: A Postcolonial and Settler-Colonial Analysis from the Palestinian Perspective — Khurram Shahzad Siddiqui · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS