Fathers Are Frightened but May Not Know It: Considering Masculinity and Attachment When Working With Fathers in Family Therapy

ABSTRACT Given the often‐unacknowledged emotional realities in theory and practice around masculinities and fatherhood, working with fathers in family therapy needs ongoing attention. Therapists' efforts can be enhanced through attending to how men and fathers may have been socialized towards restrictive masculine ideologies (e.g., devaluing emotional experience) and how relevant behavioral patterns, contextualized in gender privilege, are perpetuated through the internal experience of men being afraid but not knowing it. We offer an attachment and emotion framework for masculine socialization and clinically working with men and fathers; that is, fathers' caregiving instincts and capacity to provide development‐promoting care for their children are thwarted because they are constrained by their legitimate fear of their emotions. We review the literature on working with men and fathers in therapy (which is primarily on cisgender men), recommend ways to strengthen this aspect of therapy, drawing from the framework of attachment theory, and recognize the need for a more inclusive framework to address the heterogeneity of being a man and father.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70040
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fathers Are Frightened but May Not Know It: Considering Masculinity and Attachment When Working With Fathers in Family Therapy

Jakob F. Jensen, Brandon Jacobs, Allen K. Sabey
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
article

Fathers Are Frightened but May Not Know It: Considering Masculinity and Attachment When Working With Fathers in Family Therapy

Jakob F. Jensen, Brandon Jacobs, Allen K. Sabey
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Given the often‐unacknowledged emotional realities in theory and practice around masculinities and fatherhood, working with fathers in family therapy needs ongoing attention. Therapists' efforts can be enhanced through attending to how men and fathers may have been socialized towards restrictive masculine ideologies (e.g., devaluing emotional experience) and how relevant behavioral patterns, contextualized in gender privilege, are perpetuated through the internal experience of men being afraid but not knowing it. We offer an attachment and emotion framework for masculine socialization and clinically working with men and fathers; that is, fathers' caregiving instincts and capacity to provide development‐promoting care for their children are thwarted because they are constrained by their legitimate fear of their emotions. We review the literature on working with men and fathers in therapy (which is primarily on cisgender men), recommend ways to strengthen this aspect of therapy, drawing from the framework of attachment theory, and recognize the need for a more inclusive framework to address the heterogeneity of being a man and father.

Journal of Family Theory & Review
East Carolina University (US), Northwestern University (PH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.