Global Investigation of Clinical Implementation Strategies for <scp> <i>DPYD</i> </scp> Testing to Guide Fluoropyrimidine Therapy

Fluoropyrimidines are a vital component of chemotherapy regimens. Deleterious DPYD variants reduce activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme of fluoropyrimidine catabolism, resulting in reduced fluoropyrimidine clearance and elevated risk of life-threatening toxicities. DPYD genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine therapy can mitigate the risk of severe life-threatening toxicities, but adoption of testing globally has been limited. We developed a 91-item survey investigating global DPYD implementation strategies to gain insight into common practices and successful strategies. The survey was disseminated to Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network Implementation Working Group members consisting of 54 health care sites across 15 countries. Survey responses were received from 28 sites (52%) across 9 countries. Over 80% of sites implemented, or planned to implement, a preemptive testing strategy (i.e., before a fluoropyrimidine is administered) leveraging the electronic health record (EHR) to disseminate DPYD results to providers. All sites created infrastructure to support DPYD testing (e.g., order sets, EHR decision support), but 70% of sites indicated reliance on clinicians to remember test ordering. Only 2 sites reported high DPYD testing rates (> 75%) among patients planned to receive a fluoropyrimidine. Most sites (57%) used in-house clinical laboratories that tested for the majority of DPYD Tier 1 variants. Among sites that had implemented DPYD testing, the median turnaround time was 10 days. Few sites indicated that a high percentage (> 75%) of DPYD results were returned before fluoropyrimidine administration. Our results suggest that additional implementation strategies are needed, addressing barriers and facilitators of DPYD testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70466
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Investigation of Clinical Implementation Strategies for DPYD Testing to Guide Fluoropyrimidine Therapy

Tinashe Mazhindu, Jai N. Patel, Christina L. Aquilante, Mohamed Nagy et al.
1 citations
Clinical and Translational Science
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
article

Global Investigation of Clinical Implementation Strategies for DPYD Testing to Guide Fluoropyrimidine Therapy

Tinashe Mazhindu, Jai N. Patel, Christina L. Aquilante, Mohamed Nagy, Salma A. Bargal, Larisa H. Cavallari, R. Van Schaik, Xiaoyan Nie, Sony Tuteja, Julio D. Duarte, D. Max Smith, Nihal El Rouby, Kelly Gunderson, J. Kevin Hicks, The PGRN Implementation Working Group, Todd C. Skaar, D. Grace Nguyen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fluoropyrimidines are a vital component of chemotherapy regimens. Deleterious DPYD variants reduce activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme of fluoropyrimidine catabolism, resulting in reduced fluoropyrimidine clearance and elevated risk of life-threatening toxicities. DPYD genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine therapy can mitigate the risk of severe life-threatening toxicities, but adoption of testing globally has been limited. We developed a 91-item survey investigating global DPYD implementation strategies to gain insight into common practices and successful strategies. The survey was disseminated to Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network Implementation Working Group members consisting of 54 health care sites across 15 countries. Survey responses were received from 28 sites (52%) across 9 countries. Over 80% of sites implemented, or planned to implement, a preemptive testing strategy (i.e., before a fluoropyrimidine is administered) leveraging the electronic health record (EHR) to disseminate DPYD results to providers. All sites created infrastructure to support DPYD testing (e.g., order sets, EHR decision support), but 70% of sites indicated reliance on clinicians to remember test ordering. Only 2 sites reported high DPYD testing rates (> 75%) among patients planned to receive a fluoropyrimidine. Most sites (57%) used in-house clinical laboratories that tested for the majority of DPYD Tier 1 variants. Among sites that had implemented DPYD testing, the median turnaround time was 10 days. Few sites indicated that a high percentage (> 75%) of DPYD results were returned before fluoropyrimidine administration. Our results suggest that additional implementation strategies are needed, addressing barriers and facilitators of DPYD testing.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Georgetown University (US), Peking University (CN), University of South Florida (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Erasmus MC (NL), St. Elizabeth Healthcare (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Levine Cancer Institute (US), African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (ZW), PharmacoGenetics (China) (CN), Children Cancer Hospital (EG), Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Montana (US), MedStar Health (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, University of Minnesota, Hamad Medical Corporation, Johns Hopkins University, University of Pittsburgh, Moffitt Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Health System, National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.