Auditor Independence, Experience, Time Pressure, Workload,and Financial Reporting Quality: Mediating Roles ofProfessional Scepticism and Risk Assessment

Audit quality remains a central concern in contemporary financial ecosystems, where public trust hinges upon the credibility of financial ‎disclosures and the ethical integrity of auditors. This study critically examines the indirect effects of auditor independence, experience, time ‎pressure, and workload on financial reporting quality through the mediating roles of professional scepticism and risk assessment. Drawing ‎on the critical-positivist paradigm, this research integrates behavioral, structural, and ethical dimensions to provide a holistic understanding ‎of how human and contextual factors interact to shape audit outcomes. Using a quantitative survey method with 178 professional auditors ‎and data analyzed via Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the findings reveal that professional scepticism and ‎risk assessment quality serve as significant mediators linking auditor attributes to financial reporting quality. Specifically, auditor experience, ‎time pressure, and workload exhibit strong indirect effects on reporting quality. At the same time, independence demonstrates a weaker, ‎statistically insignificant path—suggesting that institutional and client-related pressures may undermine formal autonomy. The results ‎highlight a paradox wherein professional scepticism, shaped by experience and workload, enhances audit quality yet remains vulnerable to ‎procedural fatigue and cognitive overload under excessive pressure. The findings underscore that audit quality transcends technical compliance; it embodies a form of ethical consciousness in which auditors must navigate the competing demands of independence, judgment, and ‎responsibility. The study contributes to the audit quality discourse by revealing that fostering reflective professional scepticism and managing a balanced workload are essential to sustaining the credibility of financial reporting in an increasingly complex audit environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14419/pkmncd61
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditor Independence, Experience, Time Pressure, Workload,and Financial Reporting Quality: Mediating Roles ofProfessional Scepticism and Risk Assessment

Mohammad Ridwan Rumasukun, Muhammad Yamin Noch
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Auditor Independence, Experience, Time Pressure, Workload,and Financial Reporting Quality: Mediating Roles ofProfessional Scepticism and Risk Assessment

Mohammad Ridwan Rumasukun, Muhammad Yamin Noch
article en

Abstract

Audit quality remains a central concern in contemporary financial ecosystems, where public trust hinges upon the credibility of financial ‎disclosures and the ethical integrity of auditors. This study critically examines the indirect effects of auditor independence, experience, time ‎pressure, and workload on financial reporting quality through the mediating roles of professional scepticism and risk assessment. Drawing ‎on the critical-positivist paradigm, this research integrates behavioral, structural, and ethical dimensions to provide a holistic understanding ‎of how human and contextual factors interact to shape audit outcomes. Using a quantitative survey method with 178 professional auditors ‎and data analyzed via Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the findings reveal that professional scepticism and ‎risk assessment quality serve as significant mediators linking auditor attributes to financial reporting quality. Specifically, auditor experience, ‎time pressure, and workload exhibit strong indirect effects on reporting quality. At the same time, independence demonstrates a weaker, ‎statistically insignificant path—suggesting that institutional and client-related pressures may undermine formal autonomy. The results ‎highlight a paradox wherein professional scepticism, shaped by experience and workload, enhances audit quality yet remains vulnerable to ‎procedural fatigue and cognitive overload under excessive pressure. The findings underscore that audit quality transcends technical compliance; it embodies a form of ethical consciousness in which auditors must navigate the competing demands of independence, judgment, and ‎responsibility. The study contributes to the audit quality discourse by revealing that fostering reflective professional scepticism and managing a balanced workload are essential to sustaining the credibility of financial reporting in an increasingly complex audit environment.

International Journal of Accounting and Economics StudiesVol. 12(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Auditor Independence, Experience, Time Pressure, Workload,and Financial Reporting Quality: Mediating Roles ofProfessional Scepticism and Risk Assessment — Mohammad Ridwan Rumasukun, Muhammad Yamin Noch · International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS