Effects of second generation antihistamines on daily driving with and without subtasks measured in a driving simulator

Second-generation antihistamines are widely used for the management of allergic conditions. In addition, many second-generation antihistamines are readily available over the counter at pharmacies. However, the effects of these medications on driving performance when subtasks are involved remain unclear. This study investigated the impact of second-generation antihistamines—known for their reduced sedative effects compared with first-generation antihistamines—on driving performance. Specifically, we aimed to quantify the class-level effect of second-generation antihistamines on driving performance under everyday conditions—including periods with and without conversational subtasks—and to test whether performance decrements are greater during subtask than non-subtask periods. Participants (N = 21; mean age 34.6 ± 7.73 years) completed a driving-simulator task under four within-subject conditions (2 × 2): with vs. without a subtask and while taking vs. not taking a second-generation antihistamine (fexofenadine, bepotastine, levocetirizine, ketotifen, or desloratadine). Driving performance was assessed across six predefined events under each condition. The findings revealed that, on average, the class-level effect of second-generation antihistamines on driving performance was minimal, regardless of the driving events. However, although statistical significance was not reached, the data showed a consistent trend suggesting that performing subtasks while taking second-generation antihistamines may increase driving risk across all events. At the class level, second-generation antihistamines exert minimal effects on overall driving performance; nevertheless, concurrent subtasks (e.g., conversation) may diminish safety margins. While not definitive, these exploratory findings support heightened caution during everyday multitasking and motivate larger, sex-balanced studies to confirm and characterize medication–subtask interactions. Many drivers use second-generation antihistamines, but their effects during multitasking in daily driving were unclear. Our results suggest that, as a class, these drugs do not impair everyday driving averaged across subtasks that appear and disappear. Although not statistically significant, we observed a consistent trend that subtasking while taking second-generation antihistamines may increase driving risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-08123-6
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of second generation antihistamines on daily driving with and without subtasks measured in a driving simulator

Makoto Hiraide, Akihito Nagahama, Hiroki Yoshimura, Tomoo Hosoe et al.
Discover Applied Sciences
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Effects of second generation antihistamines on daily driving with and without subtasks measured in a driving simulator

Makoto Hiraide, Akihito Nagahama, Hiroki Yoshimura, Tomoo Hosoe, Takatsune Shimizu, Tetsuro Yumoto, Hayato Aki, Kenji Tanaka, Motohiko Sano, Atsunobu Sagara
article en

Abstract

Second-generation antihistamines are widely used for the management of allergic conditions. In addition, many second-generation antihistamines are readily available over the counter at pharmacies. However, the effects of these medications on driving performance when subtasks are involved remain unclear. This study investigated the impact of second-generation antihistamines—known for their reduced sedative effects compared with first-generation antihistamines—on driving performance. Specifically, we aimed to quantify the class-level effect of second-generation antihistamines on driving performance under everyday conditions—including periods with and without conversational subtasks—and to test whether performance decrements are greater during subtask than non-subtask periods. Participants (N = 21; mean age 34.6 ± 7.73 years) completed a driving-simulator task under four within-subject conditions (2 × 2): with vs. without a subtask and while taking vs. not taking a second-generation antihistamine (fexofenadine, bepotastine, levocetirizine, ketotifen, or desloratadine). Driving performance was assessed across six predefined events under each condition. The findings revealed that, on average, the class-level effect of second-generation antihistamines on driving performance was minimal, regardless of the driving events. However, although statistical significance was not reached, the data showed a consistent trend suggesting that performing subtasks while taking second-generation antihistamines may increase driving risk across all events. At the class level, second-generation antihistamines exert minimal effects on overall driving performance; nevertheless, concurrent subtasks (e.g., conversation) may diminish safety margins. While not definitive, these exploratory findings support heightened caution during everyday multitasking and motivate larger, sex-balanced studies to confirm and characterize medication–subtask interactions. Many drivers use second-generation antihistamines, but their effects during multitasking in daily driving were unclear. Our results suggest that, as a class, these drugs do not impair everyday driving averaged across subtasks that appear and disappear. Although not statistically significant, we observed a consistent trend that subtasking while taking second-generation antihistamines may increase driving risk.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 8(2)
University of Electro-Communications (JP), Hoshi University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.