Nationality in International Private Law

Nationality, lex patriae, continues to play a significant role as a connecting factor in resolving private-law relationships involving a foreign element, both in the context of conflict-of-law rules and in determining international jurisdiction. Although EU regulations and multilateral instruments adopted under the auspices of the Hague Conference on Private International Law have tended to move away from this criterion in favour of more factual connecting factors, its relevance remains preserved through its continued presence in domestic legislation and bilateral treaties. This article addresses the issue of nationality as a legal connecting factor and explores the question of whether the assumption, that an individual should, for the purposes of international private and procedural law, be considered exclusively a national of a single state, can be regarded as a generally applicable rule across the entire field and all norms of international private and procedural law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bratislava Law Review
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2025.9.spec.1052
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nationality in International Private Law

Dominika Moravcová
Bratislava Law Review
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

Nationality in International Private Law

Dominika Moravcová
article en

Abstract

Nationality, lex patriae, continues to play a significant role as a connecting factor in resolving private-law relationships involving a foreign element, both in the context of conflict-of-law rules and in determining international jurisdiction. Although EU regulations and multilateral instruments adopted under the auspices of the Hague Conference on Private International Law have tended to move away from this criterion in favour of more factual connecting factors, its relevance remains preserved through its continued presence in domestic legislation and bilateral treaties. This article addresses the issue of nationality as a legal connecting factor and explores the question of whether the assumption, that an individual should, for the purposes of international private and procedural law, be considered exclusively a national of a single state, can be regarded as a generally applicable rule across the entire field and all norms of international private and procedural law.

Bratislava Law ReviewVol. 9(Spec)
University of Trnava (SK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.