Risk management plans and drug safety in Canada: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundHealth Canada uses risk management plans (RMPs) to identify and monitor risks associated with drugs in the postmarket phase but does not make the contents of these RMPs public.ObjectiveTo identify information about RMPs that is available in other Health Canada documents and to analyze extent of the information.MethodsA list of new active substances (NAS) approved by Health Canada between July 1, 2015 and May 5, 2025 was generated. These drugs were searched on the Summary Basis of Decision website and any information about the contents of the RMPs was copied verbatim. The information was read iteratively and grouped into themes.ResultsThere were 385 NAS approved and 381 had RMPs. For 301 the only information was that they had been reviewed by Health Canada and found to be acceptable. The information about the other 80 was typically vague and revealed little about how the information that they generated would be used to enhance safety.ConclusionHealth Canada needs to make RMPs publicly available, should explain how their implementation will be monitored and evaluated, how the information they generate will be used to enhance drug safety and should publish updates to them as necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251414280
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk management plans and drug safety in Canada: A cross-sectional study

Joel Lexchin
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Risk management plans and drug safety in Canada: A cross-sectional study

Joel Lexchin
article en

Abstract

BackgroundHealth Canada uses risk management plans (RMPs) to identify and monitor risks associated with drugs in the postmarket phase but does not make the contents of these RMPs public.ObjectiveTo identify information about RMPs that is available in other Health Canada documents and to analyze extent of the information.MethodsA list of new active substances (NAS) approved by Health Canada between July 1, 2015 and May 5, 2025 was generated. These drugs were searched on the Summary Basis of Decision website and any information about the contents of the RMPs was copied verbatim. The information was read iteratively and grouped into themes.ResultsThere were 385 NAS approved and 381 had RMPs. For 301 the only information was that they had been reviewed by Health Canada and found to be acceptable. The information about the other 80 was typically vague and revealed little about how the information that they generated would be used to enhance safety.ConclusionHealth Canada needs to make RMPs publicly available, should explain how their implementation will be monitored and evaluated, how the information they generate will be used to enhance drug safety and should publish updates to them as necessary.

International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk management plans and drug safety in Canada: A cross-sectional study — Joel Lexchin · International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS