Medicated Seton and Fistulotomy or Fistulectomy in the Management of Simple Anal Fistula: A Prospective Comparative Study

Background Fistula in ano is a persistent anorectal condition associated with pain, discharge, and recurrence. Traditional procedures such as fistulotomy and fistulectomy remain the standard of care for simple fistulae but may be associated with postoperative discomfort, delayed healing, and potential sphincter injury. Medicated seton offers a sphincter-preserving alternative that may enhance healing and reduce morbidity. The present study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of medicated seton versus fistulotomy or fistulectomy in the treatment of simple anal fistula. Methods This prospective comparative study enrolled 50 patients with simple anal fistula (St. James Grade I-II) between January 2024 and June 2025. In accordance with American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) guidelines, only simple low intersphincteric and low trans-sphincteric fistulas were included. Patients were allocated into two groups of 25 each: medicated seton or fistulotomy/fistulectomy. Parameters assessed included operative time, postoperative pain (visual analog scale (VAS) at six hours), hospital stay, complications, work-off period, healing time, recurrence, patient satisfaction, and overall efficacy. Data were analyzed using the t-test and chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Operative time was significantly lower in the medicated seton group (18.6 ± 3.2 minutes) compared with the fistulotomy/fistulectomy group (28.4 ± 4.5 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay (2.3 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 1.2 days; p < 0.001) and postoperative pain scores (3.1 ± 1.2 vs 6.4 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) were also significantly reduced with medicated seton. Postoperative complications were low in both groups, with wound infection occurring in 2 (8%) vs 6 (24%), bleeding in 1 (4%) vs 3 (12%), and flatus incontinence in 0 vs 2 (8%) patients, respectively. Recovery outcomes favored medicated seton, including a shorter work-off period (8.2 ± 2.4 vs 15.6 ± 3.7 days; p < 0.001) and faster healing (6.2 ± 1.5 vs 8.9 ± 1.8 weeks; p < 0.001). Recurrence at three months was low in both groups, occurring in 1 (4%) vs 3 (12%) patients (p < 0.602). Overall efficacy was achieved in 23 (92%) patients in the medicated seton group compared with 19 (78%) in the fistulotomy/fistulectomy group. Conclusion Medicated seton was associated with reduced operative time, decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, quicker return to routine activities, and favorable healing outcomes. It offers a safe, effective, and sphincter-preserving option for managing simple anal fistula, with comparable recurrence rates to traditional surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.100240
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicated Seton and Fistulotomy or Fistulectomy in the Management of Simple Anal Fistula: A Prospective Comparative Study

Deepak Kumar, Samir Anand, U.K. Chandel, Rajan Sood et al.
Cureus
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Medicated Seton and Fistulotomy or Fistulectomy in the Management of Simple Anal Fistula: A Prospective Comparative Study

Deepak Kumar, Samir Anand, U.K. Chandel, Rajan Sood, Pallav Sachar
article en

Abstract

Background Fistula in ano is a persistent anorectal condition associated with pain, discharge, and recurrence. Traditional procedures such as fistulotomy and fistulectomy remain the standard of care for simple fistulae but may be associated with postoperative discomfort, delayed healing, and potential sphincter injury. Medicated seton offers a sphincter-preserving alternative that may enhance healing and reduce morbidity. The present study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of medicated seton versus fistulotomy or fistulectomy in the treatment of simple anal fistula. Methods This prospective comparative study enrolled 50 patients with simple anal fistula (St. James Grade I-II) between January 2024 and June 2025. In accordance with American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) guidelines, only simple low intersphincteric and low trans-sphincteric fistulas were included. Patients were allocated into two groups of 25 each: medicated seton or fistulotomy/fistulectomy. Parameters assessed included operative time, postoperative pain (visual analog scale (VAS) at six hours), hospital stay, complications, work-off period, healing time, recurrence, patient satisfaction, and overall efficacy. Data were analyzed using the t-test and chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Operative time was significantly lower in the medicated seton group (18.6 ± 3.2 minutes) compared with the fistulotomy/fistulectomy group (28.4 ± 4.5 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay (2.3 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 1.2 days; p < 0.001) and postoperative pain scores (3.1 ± 1.2 vs 6.4 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) were also significantly reduced with medicated seton. Postoperative complications were low in both groups, with wound infection occurring in 2 (8%) vs 6 (24%), bleeding in 1 (4%) vs 3 (12%), and flatus incontinence in 0 vs 2 (8%) patients, respectively. Recovery outcomes favored medicated seton, including a shorter work-off period (8.2 ± 2.4 vs 15.6 ± 3.7 days; p < 0.001) and faster healing (6.2 ± 1.5 vs 8.9 ± 1.8 weeks; p < 0.001). Recurrence at three months was low in both groups, occurring in 1 (4%) vs 3 (12%) patients (p < 0.602). Overall efficacy was achieved in 23 (92%) patients in the medicated seton group compared with 19 (78%) in the fistulotomy/fistulectomy group. Conclusion Medicated seton was associated with reduced operative time, decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, quicker return to routine activities, and favorable healing outcomes. It offers a safe, effective, and sphincter-preserving option for managing simple anal fistula, with comparable recurrence rates to traditional surgery.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.