Hip adduction and abduction isometric force production in young football players: reliability of different testing protocols

We examined the reliability of five hip adduction and abduction isometric strength testing protocols in young football (soccer) players. Maximal hip adduction and abduction isometric strength was measured in 20 Academy professional male football players from a youth team within (12 ± 4 min) and between (after one week) two sessions over five protocols available from a frame-stabilized dynamometer, specifically: short-lever (SL) lying at 45°, 60°, and 90° hip flexion (SL45, SL60 and SL90, respectively), short-lever standing (SLS) and long-lever standing (LLS). All testing protocols reported good to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.84–0.99), except for the moderate between-session reliability of hip abduction force LLS (ICC = 0.52–0.59). The SLS and the LLS protocols produced the greatest and the lowest adduction, respectively (d = 0.45–0.61). Similarly, the SLS and the LLS protocols produced the greatest (d = 0.22–0.35), and the lowest (d = 0.19–0.54) abduction force, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the SL45, SL60 and SL90 protocols. All short-lever adduction and abduction protocols showed moderate-to-excellent levels of reliability. The lower reliability levels and force produced by the LLS protocol suggest that short-lever testing protocols should be preferred to test hip adduction or abduction strength in young football players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33461-1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hip adduction and abduction isometric force production in young football players: reliability of different testing protocols

Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, José M. Oliva‐Lozano, Rick Cost, Vincenzo Rago et al.
Scientific Reports
Sports Performance and Training
article

Hip adduction and abduction isometric force production in young football players: reliability of different testing protocols

Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, José M. Oliva‐Lozano, Rick Cost, Vincenzo Rago, Pedro Figueiredo, Javier Arnaiz-Lastras
article en

Abstract

We examined the reliability of five hip adduction and abduction isometric strength testing protocols in young football (soccer) players. Maximal hip adduction and abduction isometric strength was measured in 20 Academy professional male football players from a youth team within (12 ± 4 min) and between (after one week) two sessions over five protocols available from a frame-stabilized dynamometer, specifically: short-lever (SL) lying at 45°, 60°, and 90° hip flexion (SL45, SL60 and SL90, respectively), short-lever standing (SLS) and long-lever standing (LLS). All testing protocols reported good to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.84–0.99), except for the moderate between-session reliability of hip abduction force LLS (ICC = 0.52–0.59). The SLS and the LLS protocols produced the greatest and the lowest adduction, respectively (d = 0.45–0.61). Similarly, the SLS and the LLS protocols produced the greatest (d = 0.22–0.35), and the lowest (d = 0.19–0.54) abduction force, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the SL45, SL60 and SL90 protocols. All short-lever adduction and abduction protocols showed moderate-to-excellent levels of reliability. The lower reliability levels and force produced by the LLS protocol suggest that short-lever testing protocols should be preferred to test hip adduction or abduction strength in young football players.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Real Academia Española (ES), Università degli Studi eCampus (IT), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Universidade Europeia (PT), Thermax (India) (IN), Instituto Superior da Maia (PT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.