Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in trapping pressure and its impact on population dynamics of sympatric pine and stone martens

Abstract Context The consequences of human exploitation of animal populations remain poorly understood, particularly for populations experiencing spatially-varying harvesting intensity and exposure. If unaccounted for, this heterogeneity may lead to inappropriate harvesting policies. Methods We developed a spatially-explicit individual-based model to evaluate the effects of such spatially heterogeneous harvesting on the population dynamics of pine and stone martens in France. Objectives By comparing scenarios of spatially heterogeneous and homogeneous trapping pressure, we investigated the sustainability of current voluntary trapping practices in the absence of dedicated population monitoring. Results We show that spatially heterogeneous trapping pressure, despite being lower pressure on average than our simulated homogenous trapping scenarios, has a stronger, more negative impact on population size and density of both species. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to account for the spatial heterogeneity when assessing the effectiveness of management practices. Neglecting spatial heterogeneity when assessing or formatting harvesting practices may unintentionally generate management strategies that yield unforeseen consequences for the target populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape Ecology
Published
2025-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-025-02282-y
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in trapping pressure and its impact on population dynamics of sympatric pine and stone martens

Olivier GIMENEZ, Nathan H. Schumaker, Sydney M. Watkins, Jean-Michel Vandel et al.
Landscape Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in trapping pressure and its impact on population dynamics of sympatric pine and stone martens

Olivier GIMENEZ, Nathan H. Schumaker, Sydney M. Watkins, Jean-Michel Vandel, Maëlys Mathevet, Cassie N. Speakman, Sébastien Devillard, Sandrine Ruette
article en

Abstract

Abstract Context The consequences of human exploitation of animal populations remain poorly understood, particularly for populations experiencing spatially-varying harvesting intensity and exposure. If unaccounted for, this heterogeneity may lead to inappropriate harvesting policies. Methods We developed a spatially-explicit individual-based model to evaluate the effects of such spatially heterogeneous harvesting on the population dynamics of pine and stone martens in France. Objectives By comparing scenarios of spatially heterogeneous and homogeneous trapping pressure, we investigated the sustainability of current voluntary trapping practices in the absence of dedicated population monitoring. Results We show that spatially heterogeneous trapping pressure, despite being lower pressure on average than our simulated homogenous trapping scenarios, has a stronger, more negative impact on population size and density of both species. Conclusions Our results highlight the need to account for the spatial heterogeneity when assessing the effectiveness of management practices. Neglecting spatial heterogeneity when assessing or formatting harvesting practices may unintentionally generate management strategies that yield unforeseen consequences for the target populations.

Landscape EcologyVol. 41(2)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Oregon State University (US), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments (FR), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (FR), Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité (FR), Canmore Museum and Geoscience Centre (CA), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.