МИРОВІ УГОДИ ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ СУДОЧИНСТВА ДАВНЬОЇ РЕЧІ ПОСПОЛИТОЇ (ЗА СУДОВИМИ МАТЕРІАЛАМИ РУСЬКОГО ВОЄВОДСТВА XVII – XVIII ст.)

The purpose of the study is to clarify the role and place of compromise agreements in the judicial system of Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The research methodology is based on the principles of scientific historicism, the use of general scientific and highly specialized historical methods. Scientific novelty consists in a comprehensive analysis of the activities of compromise courts in the territory of the Ruthenian Voivodeship of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 17th – 18th centuries, as an integral part of judicial proceedings. The procedural aspect of the court's activities has been reconstructed: composition, prerequisites for formation, topics of cases considered, etc. Conclusions. Compromise agreements were widely used in an everyday legal practice of the Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth society as a tool for resolving conflicts. The acts of the hrodsky (magistrates') and zemstvo courts contain hundreds of references and the agreements texts, and it testifies to their importance. The participants of compromise agreements were two parties who were on equal terms. Each of them was represented by the so-called “friend”, it could be one or several people. In the 18th century the board of friends was headed by a super-arbitrator. Also in the 18th century the compromise court could use the services of vozny and other officials of local judicial and administrative institutions. Compromise agreements could be concluded between the parties who were conducting legal proceedings in the existing permanent courts. They could equally be concluded at different stages: at the beginning of legal proceedings, at the end, etc. Compromise courts covered a wide range of civil and criminal cases. Thus, they could make decisions that provided not only for material aspects, but also for imprisonment, deprivation of honour, etc. Key words: compromise courts, Ruthenian voivodeship, judicial proceedings of the Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, compromise agreements, mediation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2025-12-26
Primary Topic
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

МИРОВІ УГОДИ ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ СУДОЧИНСТВА ДАВНЬОЇ РЕЧІ ПОСПОЛИТОЇ (ЗА СУДОВИМИ МАТЕРІАЛАМИ РУСЬКОГО ВОЄВОДСТВА XVII – XVIII ст.)

Сергій Володимирович Завальнюк, Роман ПУЙДА
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
article

МИРОВІ УГОДИ ЯК ІНСТРУМЕНТ СУДОЧИНСТВА ДАВНЬОЇ РЕЧІ ПОСПОЛИТОЇ (ЗА СУДОВИМИ МАТЕРІАЛАМИ РУСЬКОГО ВОЄВОДСТВА XVII – XVIII ст.)

Сергій Володимирович Завальнюк, Роман ПУЙДА
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to clarify the role and place of compromise agreements in the judicial system of Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The research methodology is based on the principles of scientific historicism, the use of general scientific and highly specialized historical methods. Scientific novelty consists in a comprehensive analysis of the activities of compromise courts in the territory of the Ruthenian Voivodeship of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 17th – 18th centuries, as an integral part of judicial proceedings. The procedural aspect of the court's activities has been reconstructed: composition, prerequisites for formation, topics of cases considered, etc. Conclusions. Compromise agreements were widely used in an everyday legal practice of the Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth society as a tool for resolving conflicts. The acts of the hrodsky (magistrates') and zemstvo courts contain hundreds of references and the agreements texts, and it testifies to their importance. The participants of compromise agreements were two parties who were on equal terms. Each of them was represented by the so-called “friend”, it could be one or several people. In the 18th century the board of friends was headed by a super-arbitrator. Also in the 18th century the compromise court could use the services of vozny and other officials of local judicial and administrative institutions. Compromise agreements could be concluded between the parties who were conducting legal proceedings in the existing permanent courts. They could equally be concluded at different stages: at the beginning of legal proceedings, at the end, etc. Compromise courts covered a wide range of civil and criminal cases. Thus, they could make decisions that provided not only for material aspects, but also for imprisonment, deprivation of honour, etc. Key words: compromise courts, Ruthenian voivodeship, judicial proceedings of the Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, compromise agreements, mediation.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
National University Odesa Law Academy (UA), Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.