Public communication and strategic planning

The article explores how strategic planning is employed to address the governance context of public communication by considering the case of the EU’s Cohesion Policy. We distinguish formal strategic planning (steps and procedures for developing a top-down strategy) from deliberative practices of strategic planning (strategy-as-practice), which enable stakeholder participation in Cohesion Policy governance. It is argued that both approaches should form part of the governance toolkit for public communication to support democratic outcomes. Drawing primarily on qualitative data exploring two regional operational programmes in Slovenia and Ireland, we find mixed results concerning how formal and deliberative planning are integrated into Cohesion Policy communication, in turn affecting its democratic potential. An integrated approach appears easier to implement in decentralised systems like Ireland’s than in centralised ones like in Slovenia. However, stakeholder commitment to deliberative planning does not fully reflect an integrated approach in either country – especially regarding a shared understanding of a communication’s purpose on the EU level.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2025-12-24
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public communication and strategic planning

Andreja Pegan, Marko Lovec
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Public communication and strategic planning

Andreja Pegan, Marko Lovec
article en

Abstract

The article explores how strategic planning is employed to address the governance context of public communication by considering the case of the EU’s Cohesion Policy. We distinguish formal strategic planning (steps and procedures for developing a top-down strategy) from deliberative practices of strategic planning (strategy-as-practice), which enable stakeholder participation in Cohesion Policy governance. It is argued that both approaches should form part of the governance toolkit for public communication to support democratic outcomes. Drawing primarily on qualitative data exploring two regional operational programmes in Slovenia and Ireland, we find mixed results concerning how formal and deliberative planning are integrated into Cohesion Policy communication, in turn affecting its democratic potential. An integrated approach appears easier to implement in decentralised systems like Ireland’s than in centralised ones like in Slovenia. However, stakeholder commitment to deliberative planning does not fully reflect an integrated approach in either country – especially regarding a shared understanding of a communication’s purpose on the EU level.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.