Identification of Burials via GPR Signal Classification and Spatial Cluster Analysis at a Prehistoric Thai Site

ABSTRACT Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) methods are particularly effective at detecting subsurface features with contrasting electromagnetic properties in archaeological contexts. At the undeveloped prehistoric site of Don Up Mung in northeastern Thailand, GPR surveys were conducted to identify potential burial features within the complex stratigraphic sequences characteristic of multiphase settlements. To assess this potential, we employed a MALÅ Easy Locator Pro WideRange HDR GPR system across a 7.5 × 8 m grid adjacent to a previously excavated area containing confirmed burials dated to 571–404 cal. bce . Radar signatures were systematically classified into six distinct trait classes based on their reflection patterns, and local statistic was applied to identify significant spatial clustering. Results revealed prominent GPR anomalies at depths of 0.4–1.2 m (10–30 ns of radar two‐way travel time). The significance maps identified two primary clusters of high‐amplitude reflections in the southwestern portion and one cluster of low‐amplitude reflections in the eastern portion of the survey area. Despite limitations imposed by the spatial offset between survey and excavation areas, the correspondence between anomaly depths and documented burial horizons provides compelling evidence for burial identification. This research establishes a systematic framework that combines GPR signature classification with point pattern analysis to enhance prehistoric burial detection capabilities in similar geological settings, offering valuable guidance for future archaeological investigations at the site.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeological Prospection
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.70029
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Burials via GPR Signal Classification and Spatial Cluster Analysis at a Prehistoric Thai Site

Potpreecha Pondthai, Thippawan Wongadsapaiboon, Mark E. Everett, Ittipon Boonsri
Archaeological Prospection
Geophysical Methods and Applications
article

Identification of Burials via GPR Signal Classification and Spatial Cluster Analysis at a Prehistoric Thai Site

Potpreecha Pondthai, Thippawan Wongadsapaiboon, Mark E. Everett, Ittipon Boonsri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) methods are particularly effective at detecting subsurface features with contrasting electromagnetic properties in archaeological contexts. At the undeveloped prehistoric site of Don Up Mung in northeastern Thailand, GPR surveys were conducted to identify potential burial features within the complex stratigraphic sequences characteristic of multiphase settlements. To assess this potential, we employed a MALÅ Easy Locator Pro WideRange HDR GPR system across a 7.5 × 8 m grid adjacent to a previously excavated area containing confirmed burials dated to 571–404 cal. bce . Radar signatures were systematically classified into six distinct trait classes based on their reflection patterns, and local statistic was applied to identify significant spatial clustering. Results revealed prominent GPR anomalies at depths of 0.4–1.2 m (10–30 ns of radar two‐way travel time). The significance maps identified two primary clusters of high‐amplitude reflections in the southwestern portion and one cluster of low‐amplitude reflections in the eastern portion of the survey area. Despite limitations imposed by the spatial offset between survey and excavation areas, the correspondence between anomaly depths and documented burial horizons provides compelling evidence for burial identification. This research establishes a systematic framework that combines GPR signature classification with point pattern analysis to enhance prehistoric burial detection capabilities in similar geological settings, offering valuable guidance for future archaeological investigations at the site.

Archaeological Prospection
Khon Kaen University (TH), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.