Assessing and optimising metadata quality for AI-generated images: A comparative analysis of generative AI and image recognition approaches

The quality of metadata is critical for the effective organisation, retrieval and management of increasingly large repositories of AI-generated images. However, the absence of inherent contextual information in such images presents significant challenges in ensuring accurate and relevant metadata. This study evaluates the effectiveness of generative AI and image recognition approaches in improving metadata quality, based on 10 comprehensive criteria: semantic accuracy and relevance; thematic consistency and contextual adaptability; user-centric language and accessibility; consistency across data sets; emotional and aesthetic alignment; inclusivity and bias control; error detection and quality control; retrievability and search optimization; interpretive depth and granularity; and statistical performance measures. Results reveal that generative AI is particularly effective in generating contextually rich, adaptive keywords, while image recognition demonstrates superior object identification precision. Based on these insights, we propose a hybrid approach that integrates the contextual strengths of generative AI with the accuracy of image recognition. This hybrid method achieves significant improvements across all evaluations, including higher precision, recall, F1-score, cosine similarity and Jaccard index. By optimising metadata quality, the proposed approach facilitates more accurate and accessible retrieval of AI-generated images, significantly enhancing their usability and integration across diverse digital platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Science
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251397636
Primary Topic
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and optimising metadata quality for AI-generated images: A comparative analysis of generative AI and image recognition approaches

Akara Thammastitkul
Journal of Information Science
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
article

Assessing and optimising metadata quality for AI-generated images: A comparative analysis of generative AI and image recognition approaches

Akara Thammastitkul
article en

Abstract

The quality of metadata is critical for the effective organisation, retrieval and management of increasingly large repositories of AI-generated images. However, the absence of inherent contextual information in such images presents significant challenges in ensuring accurate and relevant metadata. This study evaluates the effectiveness of generative AI and image recognition approaches in improving metadata quality, based on 10 comprehensive criteria: semantic accuracy and relevance; thematic consistency and contextual adaptability; user-centric language and accessibility; consistency across data sets; emotional and aesthetic alignment; inclusivity and bias control; error detection and quality control; retrievability and search optimization; interpretive depth and granularity; and statistical performance measures. Results reveal that generative AI is particularly effective in generating contextually rich, adaptive keywords, while image recognition demonstrates superior object identification precision. Based on these insights, we propose a hybrid approach that integrates the contextual strengths of generative AI with the accuracy of image recognition. This hybrid method achieves significant improvements across all evaluations, including higher precision, recall, F1-score, cosine similarity and Jaccard index. By optimising metadata quality, the proposed approach facilitates more accurate and accessible retrieval of AI-generated images, significantly enhancing their usability and integration across diverse digital platforms.

Journal of Information Science
Burapha University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.