Monopolization in Europe: Understanding Dominance as an Ability

ABSTRACT Over the past two decades, the European Commission’s enforcement activities against abusive practices often came too late. Investigations only started when companies had already acquired a strong dominant position. It proved difficult to restore competition. In this paper, we advocate an earlier intervention, namely when undertakings start to monopolize markets. This is possible under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union without legislative amendment by returning to the original definition of dominance and placing less emphasis on market shares. In line with cases like Hoffmann-LaRoche, dominance must be defined as the ability to steer the market into a direction that is detrimental to competition and trading partners. This will allow authorities to investigate the behaviour of firms at an earlier point of time, which is particularly valuable in markets prone to tipping.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf035
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monopolization in Europe: Understanding Dominance as an Ability

Fiona Scott Morton, Rupprecht Podszun
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Monopolization in Europe: Understanding Dominance as an Ability

Fiona Scott Morton, Rupprecht Podszun
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past two decades, the European Commission’s enforcement activities against abusive practices often came too late. Investigations only started when companies had already acquired a strong dominant position. It proved difficult to restore competition. In this paper, we advocate an earlier intervention, namely when undertakings start to monopolize markets. This is possible under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union without legislative amendment by returning to the original definition of dominance and placing less emphasis on market shares. In line with cases like Hoffmann-LaRoche, dominance must be defined as the ability to steer the market into a direction that is detrimental to competition and trading partners. This will allow authorities to investigate the behaviour of firms at an earlier point of time, which is particularly valuable in markets prone to tipping.

Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monopolization in Europe: Understanding Dominance as an Ability — Fiona Scott Morton, Rupprecht Podszun · Journal of Competition Law & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS