“They Were With Me, They Were Against Us”: Exploring Loved One Support and the Us Versus Them Mentality After Wrongful Convictions

Exoneration and wrongful conviction present complex challenges to criminology and the criminal justice system. While much research focuses on systemic failures like false confessions or misconduct, fewer studies examine the social and psychological impact on exonerees and their loved ones. To address this gap, we conducted 36 semi-structured interviews with 19 exonerees and 17 loved ones. Our analysis explores how wrongful convictions influence perceptions of innocence and guilt—both internally and externally—and how these perceptions shape personal relationships. Findings reveal that loved ones consistently maintained belief in the exonerees’ innocence, despite skepticism from outsiders. This study deepens understanding of wrongful convictions’ broader effects and offers recommendations for improving how the criminal justice system responds to such miscarriages of justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287251401185
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Were With Me, They Were Against Us”: Exploring Loved One Support and the Us Versus Them Mentality After Wrongful Convictions

Amanda Lewis, Martha McCullough
Crime & Delinquency
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

“They Were With Me, They Were Against Us”: Exploring Loved One Support and the Us Versus Them Mentality After Wrongful Convictions

Amanda Lewis, Martha McCullough
article en

Abstract

Exoneration and wrongful conviction present complex challenges to criminology and the criminal justice system. While much research focuses on systemic failures like false confessions or misconduct, fewer studies examine the social and psychological impact on exonerees and their loved ones. To address this gap, we conducted 36 semi-structured interviews with 19 exonerees and 17 loved ones. Our analysis explores how wrongful convictions influence perceptions of innocence and guilt—both internally and externally—and how these perceptions shape personal relationships. Findings reveal that loved ones consistently maintained belief in the exonerees’ innocence, despite skepticism from outsiders. This study deepens understanding of wrongful convictions’ broader effects and offers recommendations for improving how the criminal justice system responds to such miscarriages of justice.

Crime & Delinquency
Georgetown University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.