An Emergent Typology for Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks

ABSTRACT Evaluation that is by, for, with, and as Indigenous peoples supports responsive, evidence‐based practice that is centered on Indigenous wellbeing. Grounded in community, culture, and relationality, Indigenous Evaluation (IE) moves away from individualistic, detached, and objectivist Western approaches to focus on decolonization and Indigenous self‐determination. Over the past two decades, the field of IE has grown as Indigenous practitioners have shaped the direction and expectations of evaluation practice. Yet, despite the proliferation of IE approaches, limited attention has been given to how they are being developed. This article introduces an emergent typology of Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks (IEFs). In doing so, it explores evaluation frameworks and the diverse ways in which culture, people, and context are positioned within them. These considerations are not only relevant to Indigenous contexts but have broader significance. The people‐centered implications of localizing evaluation practice offer critical lessons for evaluators working in other underserved or historically marginalized settings, including racial equity work, disability justice, and decolonial practice. A localized, relational approach invites a reconsideration of whose knowledge counts, how power is distributed in evaluation, and what constitutes ethical, responsive practice. Written by three wāhine Māori (Māori women) scholars, this article privileges the lens of Te Ao Māori (the Māori world), while conceptualizing frameworks from other Indigenous communities through the notion of Manuhiritanga or guesthood. As Māori researchers without genealogical ties to three of the cultural contexts discussed, we write with humility and critical awareness of our position as guests in these spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.70014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Emergent Typology for Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks

Amohia Boulton, Lynne Russell, Aneta Cram
1 citations
New Directions for Evaluation
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
2.17
article

An Emergent Typology for Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks

Amohia Boulton, Lynne Russell, Aneta Cram
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evaluation that is by, for, with, and as Indigenous peoples supports responsive, evidence‐based practice that is centered on Indigenous wellbeing. Grounded in community, culture, and relationality, Indigenous Evaluation (IE) moves away from individualistic, detached, and objectivist Western approaches to focus on decolonization and Indigenous self‐determination. Over the past two decades, the field of IE has grown as Indigenous practitioners have shaped the direction and expectations of evaluation practice. Yet, despite the proliferation of IE approaches, limited attention has been given to how they are being developed. This article introduces an emergent typology of Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks (IEFs). In doing so, it explores evaluation frameworks and the diverse ways in which culture, people, and context are positioned within them. These considerations are not only relevant to Indigenous contexts but have broader significance. The people‐centered implications of localizing evaluation practice offer critical lessons for evaluators working in other underserved or historically marginalized settings, including racial equity work, disability justice, and decolonial practice. A localized, relational approach invites a reconsideration of whose knowledge counts, how power is distributed in evaluation, and what constitutes ethical, responsive practice. Written by three wāhine Māori (Māori women) scholars, this article privileges the lens of Te Ao Māori (the Māori world), while conceptualizing frameworks from other Indigenous communities through the notion of Manuhiritanga or guesthood. As Māori researchers without genealogical ties to three of the cultural contexts discussed, we write with humility and critical awareness of our position as guests in these spaces.

New Directions for EvaluationVol. 2025(188)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Whakauae Research (New Zealand) (NZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.