Low Migratory Connectivity and Use of Multiple Non‐Breeding Sites in American Golden‐Plovers Breeding Across the Nearctic Tundra

ABSTRACT Aim Many populations of migratory birds are currently declining. Understanding space use throughout the entire annual cycle, as well as migratory connectivity (i.e., geographic linkage of individuals and populations across different stages of the annual cycle), can improve our ability to identify factors driving population declines and influencing extinction risk. The main objectives of our study were to (i) document the space use and phenology of migration during the non‐breeding period and (ii) quantify the degree of migratory connectivity across the range of the American Golden‐Plover ( Pluvialis dominica ) breeding across the North American Arctic. Location American Golden‐Plovers that breed across their entire breeding range (northern North America) and migrate up to their main wintering site located in South America. Methods We used archival light‐level geolocators to track the migration. We quantified migratory connectivity based on the non‐breeding range spread of all individuals and the breeding population spread. We used Mantel tests to evaluate whether the relative spatial configuration of the sampled breeding area was preserved on the non‐breeding ground. Results We identified 13 and 7 stopover sites used during the fall (post‐breeding, southbound) and spring (pre‐breeding, northbound) migrations, respectively, and one main site used during the wintering period. We highlight stopover sites that were previously unknown and show the transatlantic and transpacific routes used by plovers during migration. We found that individuals breeding in proximity tended to be closer to each other during brief and highly limited portions of the non‐breeding period. Broadly, individuals from different breeding populations were well mixed during the wintering period and throughout most of the spring and fall migrations. Main Conclusions Overall, the migratory connectivity of American Golden‐Plovers is relatively low for most of the non‐breeding period, suggesting that breeding populations separated by large distances should be similarly affected by disturbances and changes encountered at some migratory stopovers and in the wintering area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity and Distributions
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.70126
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low Migratory Connectivity and Use of Multiple Non‐Breeding Sites in American Golden‐Plovers Breeding Across the Nearctic Tundra

Jean‐François Lamarre, Marie‐Andrée Giroux, Stephen C. Brown, Laura Koloski et al.
Diversity and Distributions
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Low Migratory Connectivity and Use of Multiple Non‐Breeding Sites in American Golden‐Plovers Breeding Across the Nearctic Tundra

Jean‐François Lamarre, Marie‐Andrée Giroux, Stephen C. Brown, Laura Koloski, Laura McKinnon, Tamara Emmenegger, Joe Liebezeit, Sarah T. Saalfeld, Scott A. Flemming, Joël Bêty, Rebecca McGuire, F. K. Sanders, Oscar Johnson, Eric Reed, Mike Russell, Nicolas Lecomte, Richard Lanctot, Silke Bauer, Oliver Love, Erica Nol, Gilles Gauthier, Paul A. Smith
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Many populations of migratory birds are currently declining. Understanding space use throughout the entire annual cycle, as well as migratory connectivity (i.e., geographic linkage of individuals and populations across different stages of the annual cycle), can improve our ability to identify factors driving population declines and influencing extinction risk. The main objectives of our study were to (i) document the space use and phenology of migration during the non‐breeding period and (ii) quantify the degree of migratory connectivity across the range of the American Golden‐Plover ( Pluvialis dominica ) breeding across the North American Arctic. Location American Golden‐Plovers that breed across their entire breeding range (northern North America) and migrate up to their main wintering site located in South America. Methods We used archival light‐level geolocators to track the migration. We quantified migratory connectivity based on the non‐breeding range spread of all individuals and the breeding population spread. We used Mantel tests to evaluate whether the relative spatial configuration of the sampled breeding area was preserved on the non‐breeding ground. Results We identified 13 and 7 stopover sites used during the fall (post‐breeding, southbound) and spring (pre‐breeding, northbound) migrations, respectively, and one main site used during the wintering period. We highlight stopover sites that were previously unknown and show the transatlantic and transpacific routes used by plovers during migration. We found that individuals breeding in proximity tended to be closer to each other during brief and highly limited portions of the non‐breeding period. Broadly, individuals from different breeding populations were well mixed during the wintering period and throughout most of the spring and fall migrations. Main Conclusions Overall, the migratory connectivity of American Golden‐Plovers is relatively low for most of the non‐breeding period, suggesting that breeding populations separated by large distances should be similarly affected by disturbances and changes encountered at some migratory stopovers and in the wintering area.

Diversity and DistributionsVol. 32(1)
Alaska Department of Fish and Game (US), Alberta Environment and Protected Areas (CA), South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (US), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Université de Moncton (CA), University of Lucerne (CH), Northwestern Polytechnic (CA), Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), Lund University (SE), York University (CA), Montana State University (US), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Nunavut Arctic College (CA), Center for Northern Studies (CA), University of Teacher Education Lucerne (CH), Alaska Biological Research (United States) (US), Manomet Conservation Sciences (US), Trent University (CA), University of Windsor (CA)
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative, Université de Moncton, Government of Alberta, Parks Canada, ArcticNet, New Brunswick Innovation Foundation, Churchill Northern Studies Centre, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.