Applying a People‐Centered Evaluation Framework to Build Stronger Relationships and More Applicable Evaluations

ABSTRACT This article provides two examples (an external and an internal evaluation with the NSF INCLUDES SEAS Islands Alliance) of a people‐centered approach to evaluation. We review how we came to our people‐centered approaches and how we used that approach in this particular context. First, we discuss an external evaluation of the Alliance examining relationships among Alliance members and with their community partners, and then we offer a discussion of the internal evaluation strategy used to better understand relationships within the Alliance. There were some differences, as well as many commonalities, in the way we, as evaluators, approached building authentic relationships that valued the context and the Alliance members. We contend that, regardless of an evaluation's goals, there are ways to incorporate people‐centered evaluation approaches into evaluation work .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.70016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying a People‐Centered Evaluation Framework to Build Stronger Relationships and More Applicable Evaluations

Veronica Del Bianco, Cheryl Sangueza, Lora A. Harris, Theresa Melton et al.
1 citations
New Directions for Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
article

Applying a People‐Centered Evaluation Framework to Build Stronger Relationships and More Applicable Evaluations

Veronica Del Bianco, Cheryl Sangueza, Lora A. Harris, Theresa Melton, Kristin R. W. Grimes, Maria F. Barberena‐Arias, Rachel Becker‐Klein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article provides two examples (an external and an internal evaluation with the NSF INCLUDES SEAS Islands Alliance) of a people‐centered approach to evaluation. We review how we came to our people‐centered approaches and how we used that approach in this particular context. First, we discuss an external evaluation of the Alliance examining relationships among Alliance members and with their community partners, and then we offer a discussion of the internal evaluation strategy used to better understand relationships within the Alliance. There were some differences, as well as many commonalities, in the way we, as evaluators, approached building authentic relationships that valued the context and the Alliance members. We contend that, regardless of an evaluation's goals, there are ways to incorporate people‐centered evaluation approaches into evaluation work .

New Directions for EvaluationVol. 2025(188)
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), University of the Virgin Islands (VI), InterAmerican University of Puerto Rico (PR), ABS Consulting (United States) (US), Inspire Institute (US), University of Guam (GU), Clemson University (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Applying a People‐Centered Evaluation Framework to Build Stronger Relationships and More Applicable Evaluations — Veronica Del Bianco, Cheryl Sangueza, et al. · New Directions for Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS