Memory Test Performance of People with Subjective Cognitive Decline Recruited From Different Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is defined as self-experienced cognitive decline without objective impairment on standardised tests. Research suggests SCD may show subtle impairment on detailed neuropsychological assessment and might therefore indicate the earliest stage of neurodegeneration. This review (PROSPERO: CRD42023382096) seeks to determine whether group differences in memory task performance between people with and without SCD exist. The review included studies since 2014 comparing episodic memory performance between people with and without SCD; where people with SCD were recruited exclusively from community or medical settings. Studies providing data for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were included in a separate meta-analysis comparing SCD and MCI. A systematic search was conducted (PsycINFO, Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed on 11th August 2023). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. 1,815 records were identified, of which 45 met inclusion criteria and were included in a random-effects meta-analysis (SCD N = 5,948, Non-SCD N = 8,468). Twenty-one studies additionally provided data for an MCI group (SCD N = 1,034, MCI N = 2,119). Results indicated people with SCD performed significantly worse than people without SCD (Hedges' g = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.26, -0.11) and significantly better than MCI participants (Hedges' g = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.94, 1.46). For both meta-analyses there was significant between-study heterogeneity. There was a significant risk of publication bias for the meta-analysis comparing SCD to Non-SCD. These results suggest detailed memory assessment may be sensitive to reduced objective memory performance in SCD. However, it is unclear whether the small effect size has clinical significance. Higher quality and larger studies are needed to rule out the influence of moderating factors on memory performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09688-0
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Memory Test Performance of People with Subjective Cognitive Decline Recruited From Different Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Richard Meiser‐Stedman, Adrian Leddy, Michael Hornberger, Katie A. Peterson et al.
Neuropsychology Review
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Memory Test Performance of People with Subjective Cognitive Decline Recruited From Different Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Richard Meiser‐Stedman, Adrian Leddy, Michael Hornberger, Katie A. Peterson, Fiona Ellis
article en

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is defined as self-experienced cognitive decline without objective impairment on standardised tests. Research suggests SCD may show subtle impairment on detailed neuropsychological assessment and might therefore indicate the earliest stage of neurodegeneration. This review (PROSPERO: CRD42023382096) seeks to determine whether group differences in memory task performance between people with and without SCD exist. The review included studies since 2014 comparing episodic memory performance between people with and without SCD; where people with SCD were recruited exclusively from community or medical settings. Studies providing data for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were included in a separate meta-analysis comparing SCD and MCI. A systematic search was conducted (PsycINFO, Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed on 11th August 2023). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. 1,815 records were identified, of which 45 met inclusion criteria and were included in a random-effects meta-analysis (SCD N = 5,948, Non-SCD N = 8,468). Twenty-one studies additionally provided data for an MCI group (SCD N = 1,034, MCI N = 2,119). Results indicated people with SCD performed significantly worse than people without SCD (Hedges' g = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.26, -0.11) and significantly better than MCI participants (Hedges' g = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.94, 1.46). For both meta-analyses there was significant between-study heterogeneity. There was a significant risk of publication bias for the meta-analysis comparing SCD to Non-SCD. These results suggest detailed memory assessment may be sensitive to reduced objective memory performance in SCD. However, it is unclear whether the small effect size has clinical significance. Higher quality and larger studies are needed to rule out the influence of moderating factors on memory performance.

Neuropsychology Review
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Alzheimer's Association
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.