Age-specific clinical performance of HPV-based vs. cytology-based cervical cancer screening in China

Cervical cancer remains a significant health burden, and effective screening is essential, yet the age-specific performance of HPV primary screening is rarely studied. This multicenter study evaluates age-specific performance of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as cross-sectional and longitudinal screening for cervical cancer among 28,501 Chinese women. At baseline, HPV screening with cytology triage demonstrates higher sensitivity (96.9% vs. 79.7%) but slightly lower specificity (88.8% vs. 92.7%) than cytology with HPV triage for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). HPV sensitivities remain high across age groups (≤35: 100.0%; 36-45: 96.4%; >45: 96.8%), consistently exceeding the corresponding cytology sensitivities (66.7%, 75.7%, and 84.9%). Over a three-year follow-up, HPV screening maintains superior sensitivity (93.1% vs. 58.1%) and slightly lower specificity (89.6% vs. 92.4%) compared with cytology. Age-stratified analyses in the longitudinal setting reveal trends similar to those observed in the cross-sectional analyses. Women positive for HPV16/18 have a 43.0% three-year risk of CIN2+, compared with 0.2% for HPV-negative women. These findings support the durable protection of HPV-based screening and the feasibility of extending screening intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67215-4
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age-specific clinical performance of HPV-based vs. cytology-based cervical cancer screening in China

Zhifang Li, Qinjing Pan, Jian Yin, Sumeng Wang et al.
Nature Communications
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Age-specific clinical performance of HPV-based vs. cytology-based cervical cancer screening in China

Zhifang Li, Qinjing Pan, Jian Yin, Sumeng Wang, Xun Zhang, Beihua Kong, YouLin Qiao, Shaokai Zhang, Wen Chen, Xiping Luo, Fanghui Zhao, Xibin Sun, Xiaodong Cheng
article en

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a significant health burden, and effective screening is essential, yet the age-specific performance of HPV primary screening is rarely studied. This multicenter study evaluates age-specific performance of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as cross-sectional and longitudinal screening for cervical cancer among 28,501 Chinese women. At baseline, HPV screening with cytology triage demonstrates higher sensitivity (96.9% vs. 79.7%) but slightly lower specificity (88.8% vs. 92.7%) than cytology with HPV triage for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). HPV sensitivities remain high across age groups (≤35: 100.0%; 36-45: 96.4%; >45: 96.8%), consistently exceeding the corresponding cytology sensitivities (66.7%, 75.7%, and 84.9%). Over a three-year follow-up, HPV screening maintains superior sensitivity (93.1% vs. 58.1%) and slightly lower specificity (89.6% vs. 92.4%) compared with cytology. Age-stratified analyses in the longitudinal setting reveal trends similar to those observed in the cross-sectional analyses. Women positive for HPV16/18 have a 43.0% three-year risk of CIN2+, compared with 0.2% for HPV-negative women. These findings support the durable protection of HPV-based screening and the feasibility of extending screening intervals.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Shandong University (CN), Changzhi Medical College (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), National Cancer Center (US), Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN), National Cancer Institute (US), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital (CN)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.